volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>Halifax</strong> Water Integrated Resource Plan Recommended IRP and Analysis Figure 6.4 Dartmouth WWTF Flow Components The flow components were determined through an analysis of available WWTF flow data and RWWFP modeling results. They do not account for system overflows as these flows will not reach the WWTFs. The wastewater flows making up the total projected flows at the Dartmouth WWTF in 2046 have been differentiated in two ways: • Existing and future flows. • Sanitary and I/I flows. Existing flows were measured at the WWTF reflecting the current contribution from the sewershed tributary to the Dartmouth WWTF. Future flows were projected based on design allowances and estimates of population and unit rates. Sanitary flows are comprised of wastewater flows from residential and employment sources while I/I flows are comprised of groundwater infiltration and wet weather inflow and infiltration. It is vital to distinguish among these various flow components as the extent of demand reduction, the method of demand reduction and the costs of demand reduction are all dependent on which component is under consideration. Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 81 October 31 2012 Page 114 of 272
<strong>Halifax</strong> Water Integrated Resource Plan Recommended IRP and Analysis • Demand reduction for the existing and future sanitary flows occurs through the ongoing decline in water use whereby both residential and employment water demand and hence wastewater generation are reduced. • I/I reduction pertains only to existing I/I flows. Future I/I flows are determined from design allowances that provide part of the margin of safety in wastewater systems design. This is particularly true of long-lived assets such as pipes with a 100-year longevity. • For the purpose of the demand reduction assessment the following assumptions have been made: - Existing sanitary – 10% reduction in existing sanitary flows through water demand reduction. This is a conservative reduction based on retrofit of existing homes and purchase of new water efficient appliances. - Future sanitary – 30% reduction in sanitary flows through future water demand reduction. - Existing I/I – 30% I/I reduction in existing I/I flows. This is consistent with the targets set for King County Washington. 31 - Future I/I – Current design allowance. Figure 6.5 shows the results of a capacity-demand analysis resulting in a somewhat longer timing (2033 versus 2026) for required expansion of the Dartmouth WWTF than currently being considered in the RWWFP. It nonetheless serves to illustrate the case study and the nature of offsetting capital costs. The figure shows that the total projected flow at Dartmouth with the -future flow projected by the RWWFP would require a treatment capacity in excess of 99,860 m 3 /d or when compared to the current capacity of 83,800 m 3 /d an expansion of 16,060 m 3 /d. With the demand reduction strategy applied, flows are reduced by about 16% to slightly below current rated capacity at 2046. This has the effect of deferring the expansion requirement to beyond the planning period of this IRP. 31 Initial Infiltration Inflow Reduction Project Alternatives Analysis Report, King County Washington, April 2009 Revision: 2012-10-29 Integrated Resource Plan 82 October 31 2012 Page 115 of 272
Page 1 and 2:
VOLUME 1: INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN
Page 3 and 4:
Halifax Water Integrated Resource P
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64: Halifax Water Integrated Resource P
Page 113: Halifax Water Integrated Resource P
Page 139 and 140: Halifax Water - Integrated Resource
Page 149 and 150: Capital Expenditure Program All $ i
Page 151 and 152: Page 1 of 3 Stormwater Projects Pro
Page 153 and 154: Page 3 of 3 Stormwater Projects Pro
Page 155 and 156: Page 1 of 7 Wastewater Projects Pro
Page 163 and 164: Water Projects Page 1 of 4 Project
Page 165 and 166:
Water Projects Page 3 of 4 Project
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
October 31 2012 Page 171 of 272
Page 173 and 174:
October 31 2012 Page 173 of 272
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
FINAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 13 16 17 18
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Recommended Alternative Resource Pl
Page 241 and 242:
Financial Model 40-4 Halifax Water
Page 243 and 244:
Financial Model 40-4 2.512 (O&M) Lo
Page 245 and 246:
Financial Model 40-4 1.028 Cavalier
Page 247 and 248:
Financial Model 40-4 3.511 Stokil (
Page 249 and 250:
Financial Model 40-4 2.075 Beaver C
Page 251 and 252:
Financial Model 40-4 2.848 Storage
Page 253 and 254:
Summary of Capital, Operational and
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Asset Renewal Costs Halifax Water I
Page 265 and 266:
Asset Renewal Costs Stormwater Asse
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Statement Concerning Halifax Water
Page 271 and 272:
Statement Concerning Halifax Water
show all

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?