05.01.2014 Views

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

volume 1 - Halifax Regional Municipality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Statement Concerning <strong>Halifax</strong> Water IRP – Tellus Institute Team<br />

and to establish clear priorities among them. Based on the information currently available, we<br />

suggest the following activities should be to priorities:<br />

1) implementation of the recently completed Asset Management Assessment Program<br />

roadmap;<br />

2) refinement and implementation of the I/I Reduction Pilot Program and overall Wet<br />

Weather System Planning; and<br />

3) an Institutional Capacity Assessment to identify the additional internal personnel and<br />

other resources HW requires to effectively oversee the implementation of these and the<br />

other proposed endeavors. Note that this activity has not been explicitly identified by<br />

HW in the initial IRP.<br />

To preserve options and ensure that major programmatic expenditures are consistent with a more<br />

comprehensive and more fully integrated IRP, actions taken over the next three years should<br />

reflect a “no regrets” standard or address unavoidable needs. “No regrets” initiatives are those<br />

that are appropriate regardless of the outcome of the additional studies to be undertaken.<br />

Unavoidable needs are programs and projects that are firm regulatory requirements or those that<br />

address system safety or integrity. In particular, over this period vigorous implementation of the<br />

Asset Management Assessment Program and the I/I Pilot Reduction Program will begin to fill<br />

the most critical data gaps, provide the detailed information required for implementation of an<br />

optimal asset renewal program, and inform a more comprehensive and robust IRP.<br />

We suggest the “no regrets” and unavoidable needs approach governs what happens until such<br />

time as the IRP is updated to reflect the outcomes of the priority studies. We recognize that this<br />

is a necessary but not sufficient basis for UARB decision-making on initiatives that entail<br />

expenditures before the IRP is updated, as the Board appropriately takes other factors into<br />

consideration as well.<br />

The Action Plan we propose should include a schedule for HW’s timely and thorough reporting<br />

on progress. Based on our involvement in the IRP process to date and the extensive planning<br />

needs summarized above, it will be important for the Board to track <strong>Halifax</strong> Water’s efforts<br />

closely as it begins to implement the activities identified. To ensure progress on the priority<br />

planning efforts, we suggest continuation of the collaboration and consultation process that has<br />

served well in developing this initial IRP.<br />

October 31 2012 Page 272 of 272<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!