28.01.2014 Views

emmanuel reynaud holy virility the social construction of masculinity

emmanuel reynaud holy virility the social construction of masculinity

emmanuel reynaud holy virility the social construction of masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7<br />

MARRIAGE<br />

For man, marriage represents a balance between daddy and<br />

rapist; legitimate private appropriation, which enables him to<br />

take a woman for his varied daily needs. With this acquisition he<br />

guarantees himself virtually unlimited use <strong>of</strong> his wife: she will<br />

tirelessly look after his needs, those <strong>of</strong> his family and his<br />

property; she will produce and rear his children, satisfy his<br />

sexual drives; sometimes she is even a symbol <strong>of</strong> his success.<br />

By giving his name to a woman he has chosen, and by (more or<br />

less) providing her with board and lodging, man <strong>of</strong>fers himself<br />

<strong>the</strong> daily possibility <strong>of</strong> putting his feet up, putting on shirts<br />

which have been washed and ironed, breathing <strong>the</strong> atmosphere<br />

<strong>of</strong> a well-polished home, watching his <strong>of</strong>fspring grow up, having<br />

sex at will, and possibly <strong>of</strong> showing his wife <strong>of</strong>f in front <strong>of</strong> his<br />

friends. But in seeking to use a woman in this way for his<br />

exclusive benefit, he withdraws her from public circulation<br />

―she is no longer 'available' for o<strong>the</strong>rs― and in so doing he<br />

creates a situation <strong>of</strong> conflict within <strong>the</strong> man class.<br />

The measures men take to restrict tension between <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

and guarantee each one's private property are many and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

vary according to different eras and regions. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first<br />

provisions is usually to codify appropriation by law or by<br />

custom; this is usually expressed in a limit on <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong><br />

allowed appropriations at <strong>the</strong> same time by one man. In certain<br />

societies it may be possible to have two, three, four wives or<br />

more; but Judeo-Christian patriarchy, with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Mormons, only permits one. Fur<strong>the</strong>r appropriations are not<br />

covered by law and can even lead to judicial proceedings. And<br />

so, whereas polygamy held a place <strong>of</strong> honour among <strong>the</strong><br />

ancient Hebrews, it is usually punishable by law in modern<br />

Western society; similarly <strong>the</strong> corruption <strong>of</strong> a minor (a woman<br />

who belongs to her fa<strong>the</strong>r), or borrowing a married woman (a<br />

woman who belongs to her husband) are forbidden.<br />

[Marriage / 87]<br />

However, legislation pertaining to marriage reflects<br />

contradictions within <strong>the</strong> man class and <strong>the</strong> antagonism<br />

between <strong>the</strong> sexes. The most flagrant paradox is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

equality between husband and wife proclaimed by ideology and<br />

<strong>the</strong> reality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> appropriation <strong>of</strong> women sanctioned by law.<br />

This ambivalence, which is perpetuated today, appears at <strong>the</strong><br />

foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian church. In 55 DD Paul, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

most important early Christian missionaries, taught that 'The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!