28.01.2014 Views

emmanuel reynaud holy virility the social construction of masculinity

emmanuel reynaud holy virility the social construction of masculinity

emmanuel reynaud holy virility the social construction of masculinity

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with her husband in <strong>the</strong> place he decides on. Likewise '<strong>the</strong> most<br />

mediaeval and bloody provision <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> French Criminal Code,<br />

Art. 324, which authorised <strong>the</strong> husband to take <strong>the</strong> law into his<br />

own hands and execute his unfaithful wife on <strong>the</strong> spot, has<br />

become a thing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past.' [2] However, <strong>the</strong> real impact <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se modifications should not be overestimated, for legal<br />

provisions are not <strong>the</strong> only means employed by men to defend<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir private property, <strong>the</strong>ir women. A whole series <strong>of</strong> measures<br />

actually aim to bind <strong>the</strong> wife to her husband, to confine her to<br />

<strong>the</strong> home, and, occasionally, to render her unattractive or unfit<br />

for <strong>the</strong> sexual use <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r man. In addition, to perfect <strong>the</strong><br />

device granting each man exclusive possession <strong>of</strong> a woman, <strong>the</strong><br />

man class endeavours to make it so hard for women outside<br />

marriage that women <strong>the</strong>mselves end up wishing to be<br />

appropriated.<br />

[Marriage / 89]<br />

Women as private property<br />

We have already seen how man manages to get a woman to<br />

sacrifice herself in return for his apparent protection and<br />

generosity; he generally ensures that his wife is financially<br />

dependent on him, and it is not too difficult for him to keep her<br />

in <strong>the</strong> home. His schemes are usually so effective that most <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> time he succeeds in persuading her that his own interests<br />

are those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 'couple' or <strong>the</strong> 'child', and that his advantages<br />

are those <strong>of</strong> his wife. So <strong>the</strong> famous 'opportunity' she has <strong>of</strong><br />

staying at home, instead <strong>of</strong> going to work outside for a boss, is<br />

supposed to be one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great 'privileges' <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> married<br />

woman.<br />

In actual fact, <strong>the</strong> only benefit she gets from <strong>the</strong> situation is to<br />

have one boss instead <strong>of</strong> two; unfortunately, with her husband<br />

she has <strong>the</strong> worst <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two. To give a few examples: domestic<br />

labour is not a paid occupation, nor is <strong>the</strong>re any time limit to it<br />

(no salary, no 40-hour week, no week-ends, no paid leave, no<br />

real retirement); in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> breach <strong>of</strong> contract (divorce), her<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional experience is considered limited or non-existent<br />

―'Pr<strong>of</strong>ession? None . . . well, housewife!'― and she will find it<br />

all <strong>the</strong> more difficult to find a paid job, and <strong>the</strong>refore is all <strong>the</strong><br />

less likely to want to resign from her 'role' <strong>of</strong> wife ; in a situation<br />

<strong>of</strong> marital tension, if she goes on a cooking, housework or sex<br />

strike, <strong>the</strong> balance <strong>of</strong> power is obviously very much against her .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!