13.03.2014 Views

XXII. BIOCHEMICKÝ ZJAZD - Jesseniova lekárska fakulta

XXII. BIOCHEMICKÝ ZJAZD - Jesseniova lekárska fakulta

XXII. BIOCHEMICKÝ ZJAZD - Jesseniova lekárska fakulta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Lectures<br />

GATING OF THE T-TYPE CALCIUM CHANNELS<br />

Ľubica Lacinová and Mária Karmažínová<br />

Institute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, SAV, Bratislava, Slovak Republic<br />

T-type calcium channels are distinguished by relatively low voltage threshold for an activation<br />

and steep voltage dependence of activation and inactivation kinetics just above<br />

the activation threshold. Further, while macroscopic current kinetics of Ca V<br />

3.1 and Ca V<br />

3.2<br />

channels are virtually identical, kinetics of the Ca V<br />

3.3 channel is almost one order more<br />

slow. Kinetics and voltage dependence of macroscopic inward calcium current through<br />

Ca V<br />

3 channels was described in a detail. In contrast, very little information is available<br />

on gating current of these channels. Therefore we compared gating currents measured<br />

from all three Ca V<br />

3.1, Ca V<br />

3.2 and Ca V<br />

3.3 channels.<br />

Voltage dependencies of macroscopic current activation are similar for all three Ca V<br />

3<br />

channels. While gating kinetics of macroscopic calcium current is virtually identical for<br />

Ca V<br />

3.1 and Ca V<br />

3.2 channels it is about one order slower for the Ca V<br />

3.3 channel. Voltage<br />

dependencies of charge movement differ dramatically from those for macroscopic current.<br />

First, their slope factors are several-fold bigger that slope factors of macroscopic<br />

current activation. Second, activation mid-point for Ca V<br />

3.3 channels on-gating is shifted<br />

to more positive membrane potentials by about 20 mV compare to Ca V<br />

3.1 and Ca V<br />

3.2<br />

channels, whose activation mid-points are similar. The same is truth for off-gating voltage<br />

dependences. Kinetics of both on- and off-gating is remarkably faster for Ca V<br />

3.1 and<br />

Ca V<br />

3.2 channels compare to Ca V<br />

3.3 channels. Further, more charge is moved per unit of<br />

macroscopic current amplitude in Ca V<br />

3.3 channels compare to Ca V<br />

3.1 and Ca V<br />

3.2 channels.<br />

Acknowledgement: Supported by VVCE-0064-07 and VEGA 2/0195/10.<br />

74 <strong>XXII</strong>. Biochemistry Congress, Martin

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!