20.03.2014 Views

New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline - Ministry of Health

New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline - Ministry of Health

New Zealand Autism Spectrum Disorder Guideline - Ministry of Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Appendices<br />

The NZGG grading system (information on this system can be found on www.nzgg.org.nz) was used<br />

for developing these ‘strength <strong>of</strong> evidence’ grades. Prior to this decision being made, Workstream 1<br />

had used the grades applied by the NAPC UK <strong>Guideline</strong>. These grades were analysed and converted<br />

to NZGG grades, where possible.<br />

The NZGG grading system is a two-tier system with the following steps:<br />

1. Critical appraisal <strong>of</strong> individual studies<br />

Each relevant study was critically appraised using a checklist and was assigned an overall level <strong>of</strong><br />

evidence, indicating whether the study had met most or all <strong>of</strong> the criteria in the checklist (+), some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the criteria (~) or very few or none <strong>of</strong> the criteria (-).<br />

2. Weighing the body <strong>of</strong> evidence and development <strong>of</strong> graded recommendations<br />

For each clinical question, the relevant body <strong>of</strong> evidence summarised in evidence tables was<br />

considered. Decisions were made on the quality (level <strong>of</strong> evidence), quantity, consistency,<br />

applicability and clinical impact <strong>of</strong> all the studies forming the body <strong>of</strong> evidence that were relevant<br />

to each question. Recommendations were developed based on the evidence by the guideline<br />

writers. The recommendations were graded by the following system:<br />

Recommendations:<br />

The recommendation is supported by GOOD evidence (where there are a number <strong>of</strong><br />

studies that are valid, applicable and clinically relevant).<br />

The recommendation is supported by FAIR evidence (based on studies that are mostly<br />

valid, but there are some concerns about the volume, consistency, applicability and/or<br />

clinical relevance <strong>of</strong> the evidence that may cause some uncertainty, but are not likely to<br />

be overturned by other evidence).<br />

The recommendation is supported by EXPERT OPINION only (from external opinion,<br />

published or unpublished, eg, consensus guidelines).<br />

No recommendation can be made. The evidence is insufficient (either lacking, <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

quality or conflicting, and the balance <strong>of</strong> benefits and harms cannot be determined).<br />

Grade<br />

A<br />

B<br />

C<br />

I<br />

Appendices<br />

270<br />

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> <strong>Autism</strong> <strong>Spectrum</strong> <strong>Disorder</strong> <strong>Guideline</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!