15.05.2014 Views

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>: <strong>The</strong>oretical <strong>and</strong> <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Challenges</strong>” 347<br />

the entire population, calling for potential “masking effect”, where the behaviour of some<br />

classes of the population would cover that of others; i.e., resulting in aggregate results<br />

that might not reflect the reality associated with certain sub-groups. In effect, the<br />

decomposition of inequality into its justifiable <strong>and</strong> unjustifiable parts is interpreted in<br />

terms of average behaviour; i.e., the use-need mean relation as observed over the entire<br />

sample. <strong>The</strong> inter-personal variations in use are thus assumed to derive solely from<br />

variations in its (non-need) determinants, where the model implicitly presumes, given<br />

(non-need) estimates, the amount of care that ought to be allocated on average for that<br />

need; provided that average behaviour being regarded as if it was a norm (van Doorslaer,<br />

Clarke et al. 2006).<br />

An appealing method of decomposition is the one based on microsimulation<br />

technique (e.g., Harding 1996; Gupta <strong>and</strong> Kapur 2000; Dormont, Grignonc et al. 2006;<br />

Huber 2006). While it offers a way out to overcome the above shortcomings of the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard methods, such approach proves to provide several conceptual <strong>and</strong> practical<br />

advantages over the commonly used ECuity group methods. First, it allows (the<br />

unconditional) use of an appropriate regression model specification of health care<br />

utilisation. <strong>The</strong>refore, it avoids the linearity restriction or the “inevitable price… for the<br />

linear approximations” (O’Donnell, van Doorslaer et al. 2007) that is imposed by the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard decomposition method. In fact, the latter was essentially developed for a singlelinear<br />

additive model (Wagstaff, van Doorslaer et al. 2003), which is not directly<br />

amenable to an analysis of health care utilisation. However, despite being conceptually<br />

unsatisfactory, linear specification based on OLS technique was advocated (van<br />

Doorslaer <strong>and</strong> Masseria 2004), <strong>and</strong> implemented (e.g., van Doorslaer, Clarke et al. 2006;<br />

Lu, Leung et al. 2007) for the measurement of inequality in health care utilisation, on the<br />

grounds that these measures are not, particularly, sensitive to linear OLS specifications.<br />

Otherwise, linear approximations to the non-linear models, using the “marginal effects<br />

evaluated at the means”, was proposed (van Doorslaer, Koolman et al. 2004) as a way to<br />

deal with the inherent non-linearity problem in health care utilisation. Though this<br />

solution has the advantage of using appropriate specifications (such as TPM combining a<br />

logit <strong>and</strong> a truncated negbin) the proposed decomposition, which remains only an<br />

“approximation”, with a bias due to approximation error, was computed separately for<br />

each single equation of the model – i.e., by decomposing separately the CI of<br />

participation, conditional consumption, <strong>and</strong> the unconditional consumption. By contrast,<br />

the microsimulation technique applied in the present study, while allowing the use of<br />

TPM specifications, the relative importance of each explanatory factors as per

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!