15.05.2014 Views

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proceedings “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>: <strong>The</strong>oretical <strong>and</strong> <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Challenges</strong>” 399<br />

(Qaliqlya) Governorate occupied first place, with unemployment st<strong>and</strong>ing at 23.2%.<br />

In the Gaza Strip, Der Albalah Governorate suffered the highest rate of<br />

unemployment (64.3%).<br />

3. <strong>The</strong>oretical arguments <strong>and</strong> literature review<br />

Recently, researchers have turned their attention away from the traditional approach of<br />

labour market equilibrium where employees have the ability to allocated their time<br />

between hours worked <strong>and</strong> leisure time. Instead, their interest has focused on constraining<br />

factors, which may cause problems of employment adequacy (Vera-Toscano et al. 2005).<br />

This broader scope provides information on a variety of labour market outcomes,<br />

including unemployment, low income employment <strong>and</strong> involuntary part-time<br />

employment which are directly linked to issues of poverty <strong>and</strong> economic well-being, <strong>and</strong><br />

each represents a different form of employment hardship.<br />

Both labour supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong> factors represent the structural determinants of<br />

employment success. Labour supply factors include both demographic <strong>and</strong> human capital<br />

characteristics of individuals within a local area. Alternatively, dem<strong>and</strong> for labour is<br />

determined by the organisation of work specific to the local areas. Differences in human<br />

capital (i.e. education) of working individuals provide another potential source of<br />

differences in employment hardship. Low educational attainment of individuals can be<br />

expected to produce higher levels of employment hardship because of the increasing<br />

individual probability of inadequate employment (Lichter 1989), the aggregation of<br />

poorly educated people might be reflected in a real levels of underemployment. Given the<br />

association between education <strong>and</strong> earnings, costs of foregone income in leaving the<br />

labour market are likely to be substantially higher for more educated. In addition,<br />

educational attainment may be tapping other variables such as labour force attachment<br />

that would be significantly associated with paid employment. Similarly, the association<br />

between age <strong>and</strong> full-time employment mirrors an age-earnings profile with the<br />

likelihood of full-time employment peaking at about the age at which earnings are at their<br />

maximum. Also, effects of marital status are consistent with an argument that women’s<br />

domestic responsibilities make it more difficult for them to combine these with paid<br />

employment, particularly full-time employment.<br />

Although these structural characteristics should affect rural <strong>and</strong> urban employment<br />

adequacy in similar ways, it is likely that most will have weaker effects in rural areas

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!