15.05.2014 Views

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

406<br />

Makhool<br />

Districts: respondents living in the following areas: Jenin, Tubas, Tulkarem, Nablus,<br />

Qalqilya, Salfit, Ramallah, Jerusalem, Bethlehem, <strong>and</strong> Gaza city are more likely to be<br />

underemployed rather than to be fully employed. <strong>The</strong> effect is strongest for those living in<br />

Qalqilya <strong>and</strong> weakest for respondents living in Gaza city. For example, respondents<br />

living in Qalqilya are 19.638 times more likely than those living in Rafah to be<br />

underemployed rather than to be fully employed. Also, respondents living in the<br />

following areas: Jenin, Tubas, Tulkarem, Nablus, Qalqilya, Salfit, Deer al-Balah <strong>and</strong><br />

Khanyonis are more likely to be unemployed rather than to be fully employed. <strong>The</strong> effect<br />

is strongest for those living in Jenin <strong>and</strong> weakest for the respondents living in Deer albalah.<br />

<strong>The</strong> results indicate that the respondents living in Jenin are 2.293 times more likely<br />

than those living in Rafah to be unemployed rather than to be fully employed. While<br />

respondents living in the following areas: Ramallah, Jericho, Jerusalem, Bethlehem,<br />

North Gaza, <strong>and</strong> Gaza City are less likely to be unemployment rather than to be fully<br />

employed. For example, respondents living in Jericho are .263 times less likely than those<br />

living in Rafah to be unemployed rather than to be fully employed.<br />

Table 4: West Bank <strong>and</strong> Gaza: Parameter estimates for the log odds of<br />

underemployed respondents relative to fully employed: <strong>The</strong> values under B’s<br />

coefficient indicate log odds ratio associated with each effect, while the<br />

values under E (B) indicate the odds- ratio.<br />

Independent<br />

Variables<br />

’s<br />

coefficient<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

error<br />

E( ) Wald test Significance<br />

Sex<br />

Male 1.239 .020 3.452 3983.320 .000<br />

Female 0(b) . . . .<br />

Age<br />

15-19 .783 .017 2.189 560.685 .000<br />

20-24 1.124 .018 3.078 1641.617 .000<br />

25-29 1.047 .025 2.849 1720.870 .000<br />

30-34 1.065 .024 2.901 1914.824 .000<br />

35-39 1.061 .025 2.890 1844.633 .000<br />

40-44 .823 .026 2.277 1009.148 .000<br />

45-49 .756 .028 2.130 714.049 .000<br />

50 <strong>and</strong> over 0(b) . . . .<br />

Years of schooling<br />

No education -.436 .049 .647 80.482 .001<br />

Primary education .156 .018 1.169 78.260 .000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!