15.05.2014 Views

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

332<br />

Di Maio – N<strong>and</strong>i<br />

variables included in the full specification (i.e. Column 3, Table 5). 15 This approach<br />

allows for the possibility of different channels being simultaneous at work. <strong>The</strong><br />

magnitude of second stage coefficient thus only gives an indication of the relative impact<br />

of different channels.<br />

We begin our analysis considering the effect the number of closure days on four<br />

aggregate level labour market indicators: the average market wage <strong>and</strong> unemployment<br />

rate in WB <strong>and</strong> the average (low-skilled) wage <strong>and</strong> unemployment rate at the district<br />

level. Results reported in Table 6 show that the number of closure days has a significant<br />

effect only on the (low-skilled) district average market wage (lower panel of Column 3,<br />

Table 6). <strong>The</strong> latter is a measure of the tightness of the labour market <strong>and</strong> a proxy for the<br />

child’s opportunity cost of not working. 16<br />

<strong>The</strong> first stage coefficient thus captures the effect of the conflict on the local labour<br />

market: the average low-skilled wage decreases with the number of closure days. From a<br />

theoretical point of view, a change in local average market wage is predicted to have two<br />

opposite effects on child labour (<strong>and</strong> school attendance): the income <strong>and</strong> the substitution<br />

effect. <strong>The</strong> former prevails when a lower market wage increases child labour. This is<br />

the case when the child works for reaching a given level of consumption. On the<br />

contrary, the substitution – or own price effect – prevails when an increase in the<br />

market wage – the opportunity cost of not working – induces the child to work more.<br />

As shown in the upper panel of Table 6, the lower the (low-skilled) district average<br />

market wage the higher the probability of child labour. <strong>The</strong> result clearly indicates that<br />

in West Bank the income effect prevails, with children working as a response to a<br />

worsening of the economic conditions induced by the conflict. In addition, closures also<br />

marginally reduce school attendance.<br />

Next we consider four household-level channels through which a change in the<br />

intensity of the conflict may have an impact on child labour <strong>and</strong> school attendance.<br />

15 <strong>The</strong> predicted value from the first stage regression is a measure of the explained component of the second<br />

stage regressor due to variation in the number of closure days. <strong>The</strong> predicted value is correlated with the<br />

number of closure days but not with the unexplained component of children’s time allocation choice. Hence<br />

the effect on children’s status can be thought as due to changes in the second stage regressor induced by the<br />

variation in the number of closure days.<br />

16 To measure the child’s opportunity cost of not working, the obvious c<strong>and</strong>idate would be the average child<br />

wage at the district level. This was not possible due to the extremely low number of observations on child<br />

wage in our dataset. Instead we use the average wage of private sector workers with less than 7 years of<br />

education. Note that the average father’s years of education in our sample are 10. Wages are in constant 1996<br />

New Israeli Shekels (NIS), obtained by deflating nominal wages by the Consumer Price Index in West Bank<br />

provided by the PCBS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!