The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges
The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges
The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proceedings “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>: <strong>The</strong>oretical <strong>and</strong> <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Challenges</strong>” 333<br />
Results are reported in Table 7. Column 1 shows that the number of closure days reduces<br />
household income, <strong>and</strong> that the latter in turn is negatively correlated with child labour.<br />
We also find (Column 2) that the number of closure days increases the number of male<br />
unemployed in the household. In conjunction with the result (Column 3) that the closure<br />
days reduces the probability of the father being employed in Israel, this is convincing<br />
evidence that the closure have drastically modified the conditions of the <strong>Palestinian</strong><br />
domestic labour market. Results in the upper panel of the Table show that child labour<br />
indeed increases in response to an increase in the unemployment at the household level<br />
<strong>and</strong> to a reduction in the probability of the father being employed in Israel induced by the<br />
closures of borders between Israel <strong>and</strong> the WB. 17 <strong>The</strong> last column shows that while the<br />
father being self employed is indeed highly correlated with the probability of child labour<br />
(Edmonds 2008), this relationship is not influenced by the number of closure days.<br />
Among all the channels considered, we find that the strongest is the change in the<br />
local labour market condition: a 10 day increase in the number of closure days in a<br />
quarter induces a reduction in the local market wage that increases child labour by 9.6%.<br />
5.2.1. Discussion of the results<br />
Our results show that the number of closures days may affect child’s status through<br />
different channels. But it is also possible that the same channel may impact households<br />
differently. For instance, closures are expected to have a stronger effect on households<br />
having the father employed in Israel since their income suffer a sudden drop due to the<br />
closure of borders. To test the existence of this difference, we first estimate our preferred<br />
specification separately for the households with the father employed in Israel <strong>and</strong> for the<br />
ones with the father employed in West Bank. Results (not reported) show that for both<br />
samples closures increase child labour but the effect is much larger for households with<br />
the father employed in Israel. 18 <strong>The</strong>n, to test if the household income channel affects in a<br />
different way the households depending on where (Israel/West Bank) the father works,<br />
we run the second stage in Column 1 in Table 7 separately for the two samples. Results<br />
(not reported) show that effects of closure days on household income is significant only<br />
for the former.<br />
17 Note that the average wage of workers employed in Israel is higher than the domestic wage in West Bank.<br />
18 Note that this larger effect is not due to a selection bias since the average income of households with the<br />
father employed in Israel is higher than the average income of households with the father employed in<br />
West Bank.