The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges
The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges
The Palestinian Economy. Theoretical and Practical Challenges
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proceedings “<strong>The</strong> <strong>Palestinian</strong> <strong>Economy</strong>: <strong>The</strong>oretical <strong>and</strong> <strong>Practical</strong> <strong>Challenges</strong>” 271<br />
are enforced under the 1966 Planning Law, 41 which confers enforcement authority upon<br />
the regional or local committee. It is thus necessary to add a comprehensive set of<br />
enforcement tools to the LGL to ensure that the legislation is properly enforced.<br />
In light of the above, it is reasonable to conclude that the LGL has introduced some<br />
positive changes in comparison with previous laws. Nonetheless, it is still accurate to say<br />
that, in general, “the system of local government provided for in the Law of Local<br />
Government is centralised <strong>and</strong> paternalistic, particularly with respect to financial <strong>and</strong><br />
fiscal matters”. 42 However, the law reflects a centralised view of local government, as a<br />
proportionally high number of local government actions are subject to ministry approval<br />
which include the following:<br />
• <strong>The</strong> local council’s bylaws (article 15 (b)).<br />
• <strong>The</strong> annual budget (articles 15 (a), 25, <strong>and</strong> 31).<br />
• Contracting out services (article 15).<br />
• Selling <strong>and</strong> renting of property (articles 15 (a), 2o <strong>and</strong> 26).<br />
• Loans (article 21).<br />
• Reduction or cancellation of taxes/fees owed to the local council (article 28(a)).<br />
• Penalties (article 28(b)).<br />
• Final balance (article 32).<br />
• <strong>The</strong> annual report (article 36).<br />
• Tax <strong>and</strong> fee changes.<br />
<strong>The</strong> LGL lacks clarity with respect to many issues. Inter alia, it lacks clarity on how<br />
the MoLG is to determine LGU functions <strong>and</strong> power; on what basis “other governmental<br />
bodies” may carry out tasks that are the responsibility of local councils; on the<br />
relationship between the power given to the local council <strong>and</strong> the powers given to the<br />
“Local Committee”.<br />
41 Articles 40-45 of the 1966 Planning Law.<br />
42 ARD, Inc. working paper (February 2000), p. 5.