05.11.2014 Views

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Computer 95% up to 40 computers, 21% only 1<br />

Internet 80%<br />

Other 31%<br />

What was the size of your organization’s annual budget <strong>in</strong> 2004?<br />

< 1 million MT 16%<br />

>1-5 million MT 8%<br />

>5-10 million MT 6%<br />

>10-15 million MT 9%<br />

>15-20 million MT 1%<br />

> 20 million MT 43%<br />

Don’t know 1%<br />

No response 16%<br />

Does the size of your budget vary greatly from year to year?<br />

Varies dramatically 12%<br />

Varies somewhat 43%<br />

Varies little 29%<br />

Never varies 4%<br />

No response 13%<br />

Please <strong>in</strong>dicate the percentage of your 2004 budget that came from the follow<strong>in</strong>g sources:109<br />

Mean of<br />

No. of responses: reported:<br />

Member fees and contributions 38 33%<br />

Local private contributions 33 24%<br />

Profit-mak<strong>in</strong>g activities 41 31%<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g from Mongolian public sources (GoM) 11 24%<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>ternational donors 43 64%<br />

Cooperation with <strong>in</strong>ternational NGOs 34 44%<br />

If your organization has received government fund<strong>in</strong>g, please <strong>in</strong>dicate the terms, and which<br />

m<strong>in</strong>istry disbursed the funds. 110<br />

Contract with a government office 10%<br />

Other <strong>for</strong>m of fund<strong>in</strong>g 3%<br />

No fund<strong>in</strong>g received 62%<br />

In your op<strong>in</strong>ion, is the allocation of public resources (fund<strong>in</strong>g, contracts) to CSOs sufficiently<br />

transparent and fair?<br />

Transparent and fair 9%<br />

Transparent but not fair 12%<br />

Fair but not transparent 6%<br />

Neither fair nor transparent 58%<br />

Don’t know 9%<br />

No response 5%<br />

109 The vary<strong>in</strong>g level of “no response” suggests that those who do not have this budget source did not respond, which of course<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluences the mean. This is one <strong>in</strong>dication why a face-to-face <strong>in</strong>terview would have been preferable had there been more time.<br />

110 The percentage of CSOs that reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g government fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Question U (12 respondents) is almost identical to<br />

those who reported hav<strong>in</strong>g a GoM contract or other fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Question V (13 respondents).<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!