Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet
Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet
Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Computer 95% up to 40 computers, 21% only 1<br />
Internet 80%<br />
Other 31%<br />
What was the size of your organization’s annual budget <strong>in</strong> 2004?<br />
< 1 million MT 16%<br />
>1-5 million MT 8%<br />
>5-10 million MT 6%<br />
>10-15 million MT 9%<br />
>15-20 million MT 1%<br />
> 20 million MT 43%<br />
Don’t know 1%<br />
No response 16%<br />
Does the size of your budget vary greatly from year to year?<br />
Varies dramatically 12%<br />
Varies somewhat 43%<br />
Varies little 29%<br />
Never varies 4%<br />
No response 13%<br />
Please <strong>in</strong>dicate the percentage of your 2004 budget that came from the follow<strong>in</strong>g sources:109<br />
Mean of<br />
No. of responses: reported:<br />
Member fees and contributions 38 33%<br />
Local private contributions 33 24%<br />
Profit-mak<strong>in</strong>g activities 41 31%<br />
Fund<strong>in</strong>g from Mongolian public sources (GoM) 11 24%<br />
Fund<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong>ternational donors 43 64%<br />
Cooperation with <strong>in</strong>ternational NGOs 34 44%<br />
If your organization has received government fund<strong>in</strong>g, please <strong>in</strong>dicate the terms, and which<br />
m<strong>in</strong>istry disbursed the funds. 110<br />
Contract with a government office 10%<br />
Other <strong>for</strong>m of fund<strong>in</strong>g 3%<br />
No fund<strong>in</strong>g received 62%<br />
In your op<strong>in</strong>ion, is the allocation of public resources (fund<strong>in</strong>g, contracts) to CSOs sufficiently<br />
transparent and fair?<br />
Transparent and fair 9%<br />
Transparent but not fair 12%<br />
Fair but not transparent 6%<br />
Neither fair nor transparent 58%<br />
Don’t know 9%<br />
No response 5%<br />
109 The vary<strong>in</strong>g level of “no response” suggests that those who do not have this budget source did not respond, which of course<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluences the mean. This is one <strong>in</strong>dication why a face-to-face <strong>in</strong>terview would have been preferable had there been more time.<br />
110 The percentage of CSOs that reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g government fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Question U (12 respondents) is almost identical to<br />
those who reported hav<strong>in</strong>g a GoM contract or other fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Question V (13 respondents).<br />
105