Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

L. How much influence do citizens have on public officials in the following areas? At least some influence: Policy making 32% Policy implementation 31% Legislation and legal reform 20% Budget allocations and expenditures 18% M. Have you ever attempted to influence public officials in any of the following ways? At least occasionally Write to a public official 7% Attend a public hearing 14% Meet with a public official 14% Participate in call-in radio program with a public official 7% Petition a public official or government agency 18% Lobby for the passage, reform, or elimination of legislation 3% Participate in a demonstration or rally 24% N. Do you know your representative to: The national khural 84% The aimag khural 40% The soum khural 29% O. Did you vote in the last parliamentary elections? Yes 87% No 13% No response .3% Which party do you support? (optional) MPRP 41% Motherland-Democratic coalition 37% Other party 3% No response/missing 20% P. Do you plan to vote in the upcoming presidential election? Yes 92% No 4% Don’t know 3% No response/missing .9% P1. Which candidate are you supporting? (optional) Enkhbayar (MPRP) 36% Enkhsaikhan (MDP) 18% Erdenebat (Motherland) 3% Jargalsaikhan (Republican) 12% Don’t know 20% No response/missing 12% 113
Q1. How much do you know about civil society organizations in Mongolia? 117 A lot .3% Enough 8% A little 51% Nothing 41% Q2. How much influence do civil society organizations have on Mongolian public officials and politicians in the following areas? At least some influence: Policy making 49% Policy implementation 47% Legislation and legal reform 36% Budget allocations and expenditures 25% R. Are CSOs making an important contribution to Mongolia in the following areas? At least some influence: Mobilizing resources for their members, constituents, or community 47% Organizing social activities for members, constituents, or community 49% Providing information to citizens about budget revenues and expenditures 33% Monitoring performance of government 34% Engaging public in discussion over issues of public concern 49% Gathering opinions to communicate to public institutions or officials 44% Communicating government positions on issues of public concern 50% Assisting government in policy implementation (for example, GoM contracts) 37% S. How effective are CSOs at addressing the needs of their members or constituents in the follow areas? Effective or very effective: Representing their political interests 35% Promoting their political awareness 36% Promoting their political activism 37% Representing their economic interests 32% Promoting their economic activities 32% Promoting their sociocultural interests 36% Providing them with a social community 35% T. Have you personally benefited from the assistance of a CSO in any of the following areas? Representing your political interests 5% Promoting your political awareness 8% Promoting your political activism 14% Representing your economic interests 8% Promoting your economic activities 11% Promoting your sociocultural interests 12% Providing you with a social community 11% Other 6% 117 After testing the survey, Sant Maral discovered a significant number of respondents could not respond to Questions S through W. Question 1 was, therefore, added and pollsters were instructed to move on to Question W if respondents indicated that they knew nothing about CSOs (41 percent). Consequently, the number of potential respondents for Questions 2 through W was reduced from 606 to 355.
Page 2 and 3:
Report No. 32584-MN The Enabling En
Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents Acronyms ........
Page 6 and 7:
Boxes: Box 2.1.1 Proposed Changes t
Page 8 and 9:
Preface This study on “The Enabli
Page 10 and 11:
of civic engagement, namely, the ab
Page 12 and 13:
Part I. Introduction 1.1 DEFINITION
Page 14 and 15:
further and recognizes other types
Page 16 and 17:
as resources. 13 The quantitative c
Page 18 and 19:
parliamentary elections demonstrate
Page 20 and 21:
As figure 2.1.2 clearly illustrates
Page 22 and 23:
The Constitution also guarantees th
Page 24 and 25:
ise of mass pro-democracy movements
Page 26 and 27:
preferences of funders. This has le
Page 28 and 29:
Recommendations: 1) The Ministry of
Page 30 and 31:
PART III - Assessment of the Enabli
Page 32 and 33:
and operations, or demand elections
Page 34 and 35:
conferences and workshops, to more
Page 36 and 37:
Capacity Building Program,” indep
Page 38 and 39:
Efforts to transform the state broa
Page 40 and 41:
2) Given the culture and norms that
Page 42 and 43:
Figure 3.3.1 Frequency of CSO Reque
Page 44 and 45:
Box 3.3.1 Women for Social Progress
Page 46 and 47:
These bureaucratic delays highlight
Page 48 and 49:
Other ways for CSOs to generate alt
Page 50 and 51:
development initiatives become more
Page 52 and 53:
Box 3.4.1 The Community Scorecard:
Page 54 and 55:
Negotiation also ensures that legis
Page 56 and 57:
Although the Environmental Impact A
Page 58 and 59:
Part IV—Conclusion This study on
Page 60 and 61:
4.2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND RECOMME
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Currently, the NCAV works in six se
Page 74 and 75: Mongolian Federation of Senior Citi
Page 76 and 77: are reluctant to assume full respon
Page 78 and 79: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: NATIO
Page 80 and 81: WSP-UV’s coordinator remains in c
Page 82 and 83: program officer, the methodology us
Page 84 and 85: critical role in promoting social a
Page 86 and 87: Annex 3: Social Accountability and
Page 88 and 89: khural chairs who served on the ORM
Page 90 and 91: is inadequate. Part of the problem
Page 92 and 93: plans, but there was no follow-up a
Page 94 and 95: Recommendation: Effective CSO colla
Page 96 and 97: wide mandate to manage and monitor
Page 98 and 99: Ulaanbaatar, asking them to identif
Page 100 and 101: Moreover, after a World Bank Superv
Page 102 and 103: Annex 5. Mongolian Media: Overview
Page 104 and 105: they would be unlikely to do so. CR
Page 106 and 107: discussion below), the director of
Page 108 and 109: Social and cultural considerations
Page 110 and 111: Findings and Recommendations: Mongo
Page 112 and 113: Annex 6. Survey of Civil Society Or
Page 114 and 115: How frequently has your organizatio
Page 116 and 117: Computer 95% up to 40 computers, 21
Page 118 and 119: No response 1% BB1. If you have req
Page 120 and 121: KK. Over the last year, how frequen
Page 122 and 123: C. What are the most important soci
Page 126 and 127: U. Are most civil society organizat
Page 128 and 129: Annex 8. Stakeholders’ Map CSO NA
Page 130 and 131: CSO NAME Gandan Monastery Gandantse
Page 132 and 133: CSO NAME Liberal Women’s Brain Po
Page 134 and 135: CSO NAME Mongolian Information Netw
Page 136 and 137: CSO NAME Ongi River Movement (ORM)
Page 138 and 139: CSO NAME Press Institute Red Cross
Page 140 and 141: CSO NAME Women For Social Progress,
Page 142 and 143: AFFILIATION State Great Khural (Par
Page 144 and 145: AFFILIATION Mineral Resource and Pe
Page 146 and 147: AFFILIATION National Legal Center (
Page 148 and 149: AFFILIATION Mongolian Radio and TV
Page 150 and 151: AFFILIATION UNDP UNICEF CONTACT ANN
Page 152 and 153: AFFILIATION Mercy Corps CONTACT ANN
Page 154 and 155: Bibliography Ackerman, John M. 2004
Page 156 and 157: Finch, Christopher. 2002. “Mongol
Page 158 and 159: ---. 2004. Rural Government Procure
Page 160 and 161: National University of Mongolia. 20
Page 162 and 163: UNDP. 2001. A Strategy for Poverty
Page 164: Zorig Foundation. 2004. “Monitori
show all

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?