05.11.2014 Views

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

Enabling Environment for Social Accountability in ... - SASANet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

If you do not believe that the allocation of public resources is transparent and fair, which of the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g are factors?<br />

Contracts are often given to CSOs with l<strong>in</strong>ks to GoM 24%<br />

Contract<strong>in</strong>g is too bureaucratic 34%<br />

Funds provided are <strong>in</strong>sufficient to deliver quality products 26%<br />

Instructions on how to obta<strong>in</strong> GoM awards are not available to the public 30%<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation about who was awarded is not disclosed 37%<br />

Very few CSOs meet requirements to access public resources 54%<br />

Other 7%<br />

In your op<strong>in</strong>ion, which of the follow<strong>in</strong>g pose a significant constra<strong>in</strong>t on the ability of your<br />

organization to raise or obta<strong>in</strong> funds? 111<br />

At least somewhat significant:<br />

Laws and regulations 55%<br />

The policies of <strong>in</strong>ternational donors 47%<br />

Political <strong>in</strong>terference 47%<br />

CSO is unknown 47%<br />

Too few sources of funds 65%<br />

Lack of time <strong>for</strong> fundrais<strong>in</strong>g 30%<br />

Don’t know 5%<br />

Other 7%<br />

In your op<strong>in</strong>ion, which of the follow<strong>in</strong>g pose a significant obstacle to CSOs obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fund<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational donors? 112<br />

At least somewhat significant:<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g processes are not competitive enough 51%<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g processes are not transparent enough 57%<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g is too short term 43%<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g is too focused on project work rather than overheads 62%<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g is limited to a one-time grant <strong>for</strong> a project 46%<br />

IV. INFORMATION<br />

To assess the opportunities as well as constra<strong>in</strong>ts on the ability of civil society organizations to <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

policies and conduct of public officials, we need to establish the types of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation sought, received,<br />

and dissem<strong>in</strong>ated by your organization.<br />

How many times has your organization requested documents or other <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation from public<br />

authorities?<br />

Very rarely 4%<br />

From time-to-time 52%<br />

Frequently 37%<br />

Never 6%<br />

111 There was a wide range of “no responses” on Question Y, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 19 percent on limited sources as a constra<strong>in</strong>t on ability<br />

to raise or obta<strong>in</strong> funds to 37 percent <strong>for</strong> lack of time to fundraise. It is unclear as to whether the lack of a response reflects<br />

disagreement about the significance of the factor or lack of knowledge.<br />

112 There was also a wide range of “no responses” on Question Z, rang<strong>in</strong>g from 24 percent on fund<strong>in</strong>g that was too projectfocused<br />

to 37 percent <strong>for</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g that was limited to a one-time grant.It is unclear as to whether the lack of a response reflects<br />

disagreement about the significance of the factor or lack of knowledge. One response noted a “language barrier.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!