East Kalimantan Environmentally Sustainable Development Strategy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

106 Exhibit 73 Proposed organizational structure for provincial climate change agency Finance collection Monitoring and and distribution evaluation ▪ Attract international financing for REDD deals ▪ Develop financial collection and distribution vehicles ▪ Establish a province-level emissions baseline and proxies for impact ▪ Develop consistent MRV methodology Steering committee ▪ Chaired by Governor ▪ Heads of Districts ▪ DNPI ▪ Representatives from key provincial government ministries (e.g. Bappeda, Environment, Forestry) Head Policy and planning ▪ Optimize land allocation and spatial planning ▪ Resolve land tenure disputes ▪ Develop enforcement mechanisms Community engagement ▪ Develop engagement processes with local communities ▪ Develop behavioral change programmes Governance Case Study 1: Berau Forest Carbon Program Ad-Hoc Advisory Council ▪ Selected representatives from private sector, NGOs and local communities Working Groups Infrastructure ▪ Develop infrastructure for abatement and to support alternative livelihoods (e.g. fire brigades, education) Growth promotion ▪ Develop strategies to support growth and attract investment for identified growth priorities The BFCP will be managed under the authority of a multi-stakeholder supervisory council supported by a secretariat. A joint working group of sectoral agencies, other stakeholders, and technical experts will support program design and implementation. DRAFT Select examples of the purpose and roles of the various groups depicted in the BFCP Structure Diagram (EXHIBIT 74 ) are as follows: Supervisory Council (SC) is the principal governance body that holds ultimate authority and responsibility for technical and financial direction of BFCP on behalf of the Government of Indonesia. The Council is composed of senior officials appointed by the Berau District Head, the East Kalimantan Governor, the Ministry of Forestry, and other national government agencies, TNC, and members representing communities and other stakeholder groups. Its key responsibilities are: strategic direction of the BFCP, financial management, recruiting, carbon trading, stakeholder relations, support alignment of government resources, and sustainability of the BFCP. BFCP Trust Fund is to receive funds from donors and potentially from carbon offsetters and distribute them to program implementers and beneficiaries. Public and private funders would contribute funds to the BFCP Trust Fund according to an agreed schedule and will receive annual progress and financial reports as well as periodic updates. Donors will be requested to provide funds with the least restriction possible to enable flexible implementation of BFCP programs.. Communities will have representatives sit on the Community Advisory Board to give input to the SC in managing the BFCP on cross-cutting issues related to community involvement in lowcarbon development and more broadly on governance. Community leaders will be involved with Joint Working Group meetings and processes. The BFCP will directly engage target communities
107 Proposed BFCP governance and management structure Funders ▪ Bilateral ▪ Multilateral ▪ Philanthropic $$$ $$$ Buyers/ investors ERs $$$ BFCP trust SOURCE: The Nature Conservancy Other technical assistance (TNC, KfW) MRV to support governance and natural resource management. Communities adjacent to any BFCP site will be directly involved in the development and implementation of BFCP activities. Governance Case Study: Heart of Borneo In April 2005, delegations from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam met to launch the Heart of Borneo Initiative. The three countries agreed to manage a cross-border area based on conservation and sustainable development principles. The Heart of Borneo covers around 22 million hectares, and the largest portion (28 percent) in any province or state lies in East Kalimantan with 6.1 million hectares of the total Heart of Borneo land area. DRAFT Given that the Heart of Borneo crosses not only districts and provinces but three countries, the project has developed a multi-layered governance structure that is a useful example (Table 3). SPATIAL PLANNING AND POLICY Technical assistance and support unit Timber concessions Land use planning Supervisory council ▪ District government ▪ Provincial government ▪ National government ▪ Civil society/TNC Oil palm Secretariat REDD site activities Advisory group Joint working group Government institutions: District, province, national Governance and enforcement Protection forest Emissions reductions Stakeholder involvements Communities Given that the majority of East Kalimantan’s emissions are due to the conversion of forest and peatlands, the most critical regulatory issues are resolving land tenure and title disputes and optimizing land-use allocation through better spatial planning. Collaboration among national and district level governments will be critical due to the cross-jurisdictional nature of land tenure and spatial planning issues. In addition, any collaboration needs to be supported by detailed technical analyses, which can accurately assess current land allocation and the potential economic benefits of using land types for different activities. Box 10 discusses the current levels of spatial planning. Exhibit 74 A single land titling system to register deeds and map land holdings is a necessary tool, and such a system does not currently exist. Technology offers ways to more cost- and time-efficiently build such a database. Indonesian planners recently built such a system in Aceh after the tsunami, overcoming
Page 1 and 2:
East Kalimantan Environmentally Sus
Page 3 and 4:
3 East Kalimantan Environmentally S
Page 5 and 6:
5 Contents Preface 7 Acknowledgemen
Page 7 and 8:
7 Preface A broad global consensus
Page 9 and 10:
9 Acknowledgements The DNPI and the
Page 11 and 12:
11 Executive summary East Kalimanta
Page 13 and 14:
13 1. The development of coal-bed m
Page 15 and 16:
DRAFT 15
Page 17 and 18:
17 Kaltim Green Program The Governm
Page 19 and 20:
19 1. The context for East Kalimant
Page 21 and 22:
21 This resource development pathwa
Page 23 and 24:
23 Both Berau and Malinau are large
Page 25 and 26:
25 In the BAU scenario, CO 2 e emis
Page 27 and 28:
27 TOP 5 ABATEMENT INITIATIVES Top
Page 29 and 30:
29 Kalimantan’s shift to a climat
Page 31 and 32:
31 The sector’s 57 MtCO2e of net
Page 33 and 34:
33 Outside of the sector’s need f
Page 35 and 36:
35 The greatest expansion is expect
Page 37 and 38:
37 improving water management in on
Page 39 and 40:
39 Including financial transfers fo
Page 41 and 42:
41 after the identified abatement m
Page 43 and 44:
43 The Case of Oil Palm Permits and
Page 45 and 46:
45 Emissions from the forestry sect
Page 47 and 48:
47 across Kalimantan in 1997 and 19
Page 49 and 50:
49 Utilizing concession buyout sche
Page 51 and 52:
51 Pilot Projects Pilot projects ha
Page 53 and 54:
53 GDP Potential The economic decli
Page 55 and 56: 55 Downstream manufacturing would i
Page 57 and 58: 57 downstream manufacturing as it w
Page 59 and 60: 59 Swidden agricultural practiced b
Page 61 and 62: 61 Although East Kalimantan has far
Page 63 and 64: 63 Reaching average national yields
Page 65 and 66: 65 farmers . We have identified sev
Page 67 and 68: 67 Many mining operations are locat
Page 69 and 70: 69 Unlike timber or oil palm planta
Page 71 and 72: 71 exploration and production conce
Page 73 and 74: 73 The Economic Opportunity of Post
Page 75 and 76: 75 Entering downstream value chain
Page 77 and 78: 77 Current Context The oil and gas
Page 79 and 80: 79 granted in 2008-2009 and contain
Page 81 and 82: 81 Emission from flaring is declini
Page 83 and 84: 83 Satellite images can help monito
Page 85 and 86: 85 Under business as usual, relativ
Page 87 and 88: 87 BERAU Berau is the third largest
Page 89 and 90: 89 350,000 ha of Kutai Timur is cat
Page 91 and 92: 91 substantial natural resource ext
Page 93 and 94: 93 Borneo conservation area as well
Page 95 and 96: 95 agricultural processing. As Pena
Page 97 and 98: 97 Range of climate related risks t
Page 99 and 100: 99 predict increased precipitation
Page 101 and 102: 101 In addition to the refinery and
Page 103 and 104: 103 The greatest economic risks fro
Page 105: 105 change issues. In December 2009
Page 109 and 110: 109 the lack of a strong system, th
Page 111 and 112: 111 Carbon Accounting, Standards, a
Page 113 and 114: 113 EXAMPLE INITIATIVES REQUIRING C
Page 115 and 116: 115 for example, includes represent
Page 117 and 118: DRAFT 117
Page 119 and 120: 119 Sources • 2010, Kesiapan Kali
Page 121 and 122: 121 • Badan Perijinan Dan Penanam
Page 123 and 124: 123 • Daniel Murdiyarso et al, Me
Page 125 and 126: 125 • Marcus Colchester et al, Pr
Page 127 and 128: 127 • Yosep Ruslim et al, STUDY O
show all

East Kalimantan Environmentally Sustainable Development Strategy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?