East Kalimantan Environmentally Sustainable Development Strategy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

108 Table 3 Box 10 HEART OF BORNEO GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE Level Structure Activity Person in charge Trilateral There is no agreed • Annual trilateral meeting • Related departments institutional structure yet. Until now, the (commitment, exchange ideas and information) in each country highest forum is a • International outreach Trilateral Meeting (fundraising, awareness, conflict resolution) • Strategic Plan of Action (SPA) as joint activity base Related departments in each country National Province District National committee: Advisory Group, National Working Groups, Secretariat (independent, small) Provincial Steering Committee Local government of each district or city • Development coordination and domestic outreach • Funding synergy • Regulation and mechanism • Local policy synergy • Partnership/ network development forumf • Monitoring • Socialization • Community participation • National Working Group • Province Working Group • District Working groups • Local government body, related government offices, District/ city government, universities, NGOs • Local government body, related government offices, community groups, leaders of ethnic groups, NGOs DRAFT Multiple Levels of Spatial Planning Multiple levels of planning have important implications for environmentally sustainable development and improved planning at all levels needs to integrate carbon and CO2 emissions as an explicit consideration. Propeda (Program Pembangunan Daerah) are long-term strategic plans that lay out infrastructure plans, major economic development investments, and long-term goals. RTRWP (Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Provinsi) is a national system of spatial planning that maps broad areas into production forest, protection forest, and non-forest areas that determine which major land uses are allowed. Permitting and licensing is the purview of district, provincial, and national government agencies, which make important decisions about whether and where to site concessions within spatial plan zones with tremendous implications for emissions. Land use planning within license areas is done by land owners, managers and the stakeholders who make important decisions about land use that affect carbon emissions, social, and biodiversity outcomes.
109 the lack of a strong system, the particular challenges of how long-term armed conflict had shaped claims about customary rights, and the loss of physical records due to the disaster. This exercise shows that land titling and spatial planning mix complex, historical, social, economic, and political issues, and that close community support is essential for these initiatives. The backbone of such a system is a community engagement approach that undertakes community-based land mapping and land adjudication, builds institutional capacity at the local level, ensures the process is done in a fair and transparent manner, and clearly communicates the benefits to the local people. Environmental Impact Assessments (AMDAL) are very important tools for managing spatial planning and the process of licensing and permitting. But the role of assessments also needs to be strengthened, so that they provide a rigorous consideration of environmental concerns before licenses are issued. Assessments should be broadened to include a specific focus on carbon emissions and peatlands. Box 11 discusses Indonesia’s Spatial Data Infrastructure and Box 12 introduces the concept of High Conservation-Value Forest. Indonesia’s Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) Good planning is impossible without high-quality data, broad sharing of data, and transparency. Indonesia is making an effort to address these challenges through the development of a Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI). The Ministry of Forestry is leading on the data management for the Forest Estate through development of the Forest Resource Information System. There are currently several pilots of the SDI, but all are located in Java. Berau Government, TNC, and partners have been exploring the potential for an SDI pilot as part of BFCP. High Conservation-Value Forest The concept of High Conservation Value Forest (HCVF) emerged as part of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standard for forest management to guide the identification of areas with exceptionally important social, cultural, or environmental value and to implement a system of management and monitoring to guarantee that this value would be maintained or enhanced. DRAFT Today, HCV is used for spatial planning in Indonesia at the national or provincial level, for guiding plantation development to minimize negative ecological and social effects from natural forest conversion. During the IUP or Izin Lokasi process, HCV areas are identified by developers in their submissions. and developers are required to set aside and protect HCV land as part of their permits. The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil looks at compliance with HCV plans in assessing plantations for sustainability certification. Banks consider plantations’ records here as part of due diligence to assess loan requests. Box 11 Box 12 MRV AND CARBON ACCOUNTING National MRV standards and systems are likely to be a key components of a global deal on REDD and REDD+. East Kalimantan will need a technical support unit is needed to develop a basic MRV system for the province, and ensure that it is consistent with eventual national efforts. The MRV system will need to establish the province’s baseline and create basic proxies for lowered carbon emissions (such as reduced deforestation), used to assess reduction efforts and to monitor impact. The need for such a system has already been established in the Norway-Indonesian Partnership, which is intended to make payments for verified emissions, in its later stages. Brazil’s Amazon Fund, for example, already raises money on the basis of avoided deforestation achieved
Page 1 and 2:
East Kalimantan Environmentally Sus
Page 3 and 4:
3 East Kalimantan Environmentally S
Page 5 and 6:
5 Contents Preface 7 Acknowledgemen
Page 7 and 8:
7 Preface A broad global consensus
Page 9 and 10:
9 Acknowledgements The DNPI and the
Page 11 and 12:
11 Executive summary East Kalimanta
Page 13 and 14:
13 1. The development of coal-bed m
Page 15 and 16:
DRAFT 15
Page 17 and 18:
17 Kaltim Green Program The Governm
Page 19 and 20:
19 1. The context for East Kalimant
Page 21 and 22:
21 This resource development pathwa
Page 23 and 24:
23 Both Berau and Malinau are large
Page 25 and 26:
25 In the BAU scenario, CO 2 e emis
Page 27 and 28:
27 TOP 5 ABATEMENT INITIATIVES Top
Page 29 and 30:
29 Kalimantan’s shift to a climat
Page 31 and 32:
31 The sector’s 57 MtCO2e of net
Page 33 and 34:
33 Outside of the sector’s need f
Page 35 and 36:
35 The greatest expansion is expect
Page 37 and 38:
37 improving water management in on
Page 39 and 40:
39 Including financial transfers fo
Page 41 and 42:
41 after the identified abatement m
Page 43 and 44:
43 The Case of Oil Palm Permits and
Page 45 and 46:
45 Emissions from the forestry sect
Page 47 and 48:
47 across Kalimantan in 1997 and 19
Page 49 and 50:
49 Utilizing concession buyout sche
Page 51 and 52:
51 Pilot Projects Pilot projects ha
Page 53 and 54:
53 GDP Potential The economic decli
Page 55 and 56:
55 Downstream manufacturing would i
Page 57 and 58: 57 downstream manufacturing as it w
Page 59 and 60: 59 Swidden agricultural practiced b
Page 61 and 62: 61 Although East Kalimantan has far
Page 63 and 64: 63 Reaching average national yields
Page 65 and 66: 65 farmers . We have identified sev
Page 67 and 68: 67 Many mining operations are locat
Page 69 and 70: 69 Unlike timber or oil palm planta
Page 71 and 72: 71 exploration and production conce
Page 73 and 74: 73 The Economic Opportunity of Post
Page 75 and 76: 75 Entering downstream value chain
Page 77 and 78: 77 Current Context The oil and gas
Page 79 and 80: 79 granted in 2008-2009 and contain
Page 81 and 82: 81 Emission from flaring is declini
Page 83 and 84: 83 Satellite images can help monito
Page 85 and 86: 85 Under business as usual, relativ
Page 87 and 88: 87 BERAU Berau is the third largest
Page 89 and 90: 89 350,000 ha of Kutai Timur is cat
Page 91 and 92: 91 substantial natural resource ext
Page 93 and 94: 93 Borneo conservation area as well
Page 95 and 96: 95 agricultural processing. As Pena
Page 97 and 98: 97 Range of climate related risks t
Page 99 and 100: 99 predict increased precipitation
Page 101 and 102: 101 In addition to the refinery and
Page 103 and 104: 103 The greatest economic risks fro
Page 105 and 106: 105 change issues. In December 2009
Page 107: 107 Proposed BFCP governance and ma
Page 111 and 112: 111 Carbon Accounting, Standards, a
Page 113 and 114: 113 EXAMPLE INITIATIVES REQUIRING C
Page 115 and 116: 115 for example, includes represent
Page 117 and 118: DRAFT 117
Page 119 and 120: 119 Sources • 2010, Kesiapan Kali
Page 121 and 122: 121 • Badan Perijinan Dan Penanam
Page 123 and 124: 123 • Daniel Murdiyarso et al, Me
Page 125 and 126: 125 • Marcus Colchester et al, Pr
Page 127 and 128: 127 • Yosep Ruslim et al, STUDY O
show all

East Kalimantan Environmentally Sustainable Development Strategy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?