19.11.2014 Views

Indigenous Peoples and Conservation Organizations

Indigenous Peoples and Conservation Organizations

Indigenous Peoples and Conservation Organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Foi in Papua New Guinea 101<br />

have seen the warning sign in their own communities,<br />

<strong>and</strong> this has paved the way for a stronger<br />

partnership with conservation organizations.<br />

IV. Partnership between WWF<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Lake People<br />

4.1 Establishing the Lake Kutubu Wildlife<br />

Management Area<br />

In 1988, Kone Yore, a community leader from<br />

Tubage village, proposed that a national park be<br />

established around Mt. Kemenagi, which rises<br />

above Lake Kutubu at the southeastern end. The<br />

community knew very little about what establishing<br />

such a park would mean, but it supported the<br />

idea of establishing an area in which resources<br />

would be preserved for future generations. Kone<br />

Yore visited the Department of Environment <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>Conservation</strong> (DEC), which had jurisdiction of<br />

protected areas in PNG, to discuss the matter. He<br />

was surprised to hear that the National Parks Act<br />

required that parkl<strong>and</strong> be ceded to the state. The<br />

community was not interested in surrendering<br />

ownership, <strong>and</strong> the idea was temporarily dropped.<br />

In 1989 Chevron Niugini cleared an area near<br />

Gesege village to drill a test well. The community<br />

expressed dissatisfaction with the K1,000<br />

compensation paid by Chevron Niugini for the<br />

clearing the site. The lake communities were<br />

also increasingly concerned about the potential<br />

impact of planned infrastructure, including the<br />

access road from Pimaga to the oil fields <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Moro airstrip. One community member, Sabe<br />

Ko’osabe, wrote <strong>and</strong> later visited the DEC to discuss<br />

the establishment of some sort of protected<br />

area around Lake Kutubu that did not require surrender<br />

of l<strong>and</strong> ownership.<br />

DEC suggested that a Wildlife Management Area<br />

(WMA) could be established under the Fauna<br />

(Protection <strong>and</strong> Control) Act 1978. A WMA does<br />

not require the surrender of l<strong>and</strong> to the Crown,<br />

<strong>and</strong> does retain customary ownership. The act<br />

essentially enables local communities to establish<br />

rules for the management of fauna <strong>and</strong> flora habitat.<br />

These rules are administered by a Wildlife<br />

Management Area Committee (WMAC)<br />

appointed by the l<strong>and</strong>owners. The government<br />

publicly registers a WMA once its boundary is<br />

demarcated, the rules agreed upon, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

WMAC members nominated. The rules then<br />

have the force of law. Unlike a national park, a<br />

WMA may be dissolved by l<strong>and</strong>owners at any<br />

time, or its rules amended or altered. L<strong>and</strong>owners<br />

set the penalty for infringement of rules, <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

largely up to the WMAC to enforce them, since<br />

DEC has a very small rural presence.<br />

For a WMA to be established, all l<strong>and</strong>owners<br />

must agree to the establishment <strong>and</strong> to the rules<br />

of enforcement. Leaders from Gesege village<br />

approached Chevron for assistance to engage a<br />

consultant to help garner support for setting up a<br />

management area <strong>and</strong> to prepare the paperwork<br />

for registering it. Meetings were held in all of<br />

the lake communities, <strong>and</strong> broad support<br />

emerged to establish the Lake Kutubu Wildlife<br />

Management Area. Each community defined the<br />

boundaries of the l<strong>and</strong> that members wished to<br />

include, <strong>and</strong> made recommendations for the rules<br />

of enforcement. The key issues that the community<br />

wished to address were<br />

• control of l<strong>and</strong> clearing;<br />

• appropriate compensation for l<strong>and</strong> clearing<br />

by the Kutubu Oil Project <strong>and</strong> others;<br />

• the potential impacts of the Kutubu access<br />

road;<br />

• achievement of balanced development; <strong>and</strong><br />

• improved management of traditional<br />

resources such as canoe trees, orchids, <strong>and</strong><br />

black palm.<br />

In 1991, Chevron Niugini provided surveyors to<br />

allow the boundary to be legally defined. In<br />

April 1992, DEC was advised of the communities’<br />

desire <strong>and</strong> readiness to establish Lake<br />

Kutubu WMA, the proposed rules of enforcement,<br />

the boundary description, <strong>and</strong> the members<br />

of the WMAC. The WMA was publicly registered<br />

on June 25, 1992, but for some reason the<br />

rules were not included in the official notice.<br />

4.2 WWF’s Involvement in Community<br />

Research<br />

In late 1993, prior to commencement of the<br />

Kikori ICDP, WWF received a request from the<br />

Lake Kutubu WMA to help prepare interim<br />

management guidelines for the area. This assistance<br />

was provided <strong>and</strong>, through extensive community<br />

consultations, a more comprehensive set<br />

of management procedures <strong>and</strong> rules was developed<br />

in 1994.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!