19.11.2014 Views

Indigenous Peoples and Conservation Organizations

Indigenous Peoples and Conservation Organizations

Indigenous Peoples and Conservation Organizations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Runa in Ecuador 43<br />

However, it remains an open question what their<br />

role should be in the evolution of new structures<br />

for sustainable development. Do new economic<br />

models require transformation of the federations’<br />

mission <strong>and</strong> governing structure, or can new<br />

models bubble up through small community-level<br />

projects? If federations do not play a role, how<br />

will communities obtain the skills needed to<br />

carry out these projects <strong>and</strong> obtain access to marketing,<br />

funding, <strong>and</strong> information networks?<br />

Environmental NGOs must analyze more carefully<br />

their strategies to combine conservation <strong>and</strong><br />

development. In choosing to support community<br />

development projects, NGOs need to think about<br />

what impact results will have at a wider “l<strong>and</strong>scape”<br />

level. Where real regional impact is possible,<br />

higher levels of commitment <strong>and</strong> continuity<br />

of support may be justified. Inevitably that<br />

means NGOs should look at the role indigenous<br />

organizations play <strong>and</strong> can play in the policy<br />

arena. Commitment to a new vision of people’s<br />

parks requires rethinking past patterns of institutional<br />

support <strong>and</strong> helping to foster institutions<br />

that increase community control <strong>and</strong> capacity <strong>and</strong><br />

make proposed models for indigenous management<br />

of territories viable.<br />

Endnotes<br />

1. The author would like to thank the directorate<br />

of FOIN, the members of the PUMAREN team<br />

(especially Jaime Shiguango), <strong>and</strong> community<br />

members in Huahua Sumaco <strong>and</strong> Amazonas for<br />

their help in obtaining updated information for<br />

this case study. Thanks are also offered to James<br />

Levy, David Neill, Matthew Perl, Jorge Uquillas,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Barbara Wyckoff-Baird for their comments<br />

on early drafts of this chapter.<br />

2. According to CEDI (1991, 64), 138,935 indigenous<br />

people lived in the approximately 6.2 million<br />

square kilometers of the Brazilian Amazon.<br />

3. For simplicity, PUMAREN is used here as the<br />

name for an evolving project whose first phase<br />

began as LETIMAREN (Legalization of <strong>Indigenous</strong><br />

L<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Management of Natural Resources).<br />

4. This chapter often uses Napo Province as<br />

inclusive of Sucumbios <strong>and</strong> Orellana provinces.<br />

In 1920 the uncharted region east of the Andes<br />

known as the Oriente was divided into four<br />

provinces, including Napo <strong>and</strong> Pastaza. Only in<br />

1989 was Napo’s northern section sliced off to<br />

form Sucumbios Province, <strong>and</strong> in 1998 Napo was<br />

further subdivided to form Orellana.<br />

5. Shuar <strong>and</strong> Achuar peoples, who successfully<br />

avoided being missionized early on, still maintain<br />

their unique identities <strong>and</strong> live in large numbers<br />

in western Pastaza <strong>and</strong> southern Ecuador. Only a<br />

few Zaparo speakers have survived, intermixed<br />

with Quichua speakers.<br />

6. Since 1997, indigenous organizations have<br />

coordinated more major protests (including two<br />

in 1999) with a broader base of peasant <strong>and</strong> labor<br />

union organizations.<br />

7. According to Dinerstein, et al. (1995), the<br />

ecoregions occupied by Runa include two<br />

Tropical Moist Broadleaf Forest habitats <strong>and</strong> one<br />

Montane Grassl<strong>and</strong> habitat. All are ranked as<br />

globally outst<strong>and</strong>ing, <strong>and</strong> of highest regional priority<br />

for conservation. The Sumaco region<br />

includes all three: #22, Napo Moist Forest<br />

(369,847 km 2 ) in Ecuador, Colombia, <strong>and</strong> Peru;<br />

#47, Eastern Cordillera Real Montane forests<br />

(84,442 km 2 ) in Ecuador, Colombia, <strong>and</strong> Peru;<br />

<strong>and</strong> #139, Northern Andean Paramo (58,806 km 2 )<br />

in Ecuador <strong>and</strong> Peru.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!