Draft EA - San Diego International Airport
Draft EA - San Diego International Airport
Draft EA - San Diego International Airport
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – PROPOSED RUNWAY 9 DISPLACED THRESHOLD<br />
Coastal Act compliance and the project, followed by the project consistency analysis for each, include the<br />
following:<br />
<br />
Provide for the present use and enjoyment of the bay and tidelands in such a way as to maintain<br />
options and opportunities for future use and enjoyment.<br />
The Proposed Action consists of adjusting the existing runway threshold and glide slope in order to meet FAA<br />
criteria necessary to maintain existing ILS CAT I approaches to Runway 9 by airplane Approach Category D<br />
aircraft. As such, the Proposed Action would not conflict with the PMP goal to provide for the present use<br />
and enjoyment of the Bay and tidelands area adjacent to and surrounding the APE in such a way as to<br />
maintain options and opportunities for future use and enjoyment.<br />
<br />
The District, as trustee for the people of the State of California, will administer the tidelands to provide<br />
the greatest economic, social, and aesthetic benefits to current and future generations.<br />
The Proposed Action would adjust the existing runway threshold and glide slope to meet FAA criteria for<br />
airplane Approach Category D CAT I instrument approaches on Runway 9. The loss of this ability would have<br />
negative impacts on the region, as landings would not be permitted during poor visibility conditions and<br />
flights would be diverted to nearby airports. Consequently, the Proposed Action would not result in economic<br />
gains but would protect the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Diego</strong> area from economic losses. Additionally, the proposed improvement<br />
would not result in significant adverse aesthetic impacts to surrounding regions (see Section 4.13, Light<br />
Emissions and Visual Impacts). By protecting the local economy and avoiding negative aesthetic impacts, the<br />
Proposed Action would be consistent with the PMP goal to administer the tidelands area adjacent to and<br />
surrounding the APE to provide the greatest economic, social, and aesthetic benefits to present and future<br />
generations.<br />
<br />
District will integrate the tidelands into a functional regional transportation network.<br />
The Proposed Action would not impact or improve the existing surface transportation network, but would<br />
meet FAA criteria necessary to maintain a CAT I precision instrument approach by airplane Approach Category<br />
D aircraft necessary to preserve existing aircraft operations at the <strong>Airport</strong>.<br />
<br />
The District will enhance and maintain the Bay and tidelands as an attractive physical and biological<br />
entity.<br />
Physical attractiveness is not applicable in the case of a runway displaced threshold relocation that does not<br />
involve major construction and has no impact on existing buildings (see Section 4.13, Light Emissions and<br />
Visual Impacts). The relocation of runway lights and navigational aids off-<strong>Airport</strong> would occur at existing<br />
lighting locations and result in the removal of the two lighting stations farthest from the runway end, reducing<br />
off-<strong>Airport</strong> effects. The Proposed Action would be consistent with the PMP goal to enhance and maintain the<br />
Bay and tidelands area adjacent to and surrounding the Study Area as an attractive physical and biological<br />
entity.<br />
<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EA</strong><br />
Environmental Consequences<br />
[4-9]