21.11.2014 Views

Draft EA - San Diego International Airport

Draft EA - San Diego International Airport

Draft EA - San Diego International Airport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SAN DIEGO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – PROPOSED RUNWAY 9 DISPLACED THRESHOLD<br />

Coastal Act compliance and the project, followed by the project consistency analysis for each, include the<br />

following:<br />

<br />

Provide for the present use and enjoyment of the bay and tidelands in such a way as to maintain<br />

options and opportunities for future use and enjoyment.<br />

The Proposed Action consists of adjusting the existing runway threshold and glide slope in order to meet FAA<br />

criteria necessary to maintain existing ILS CAT I approaches to Runway 9 by airplane Approach Category D<br />

aircraft. As such, the Proposed Action would not conflict with the PMP goal to provide for the present use<br />

and enjoyment of the Bay and tidelands area adjacent to and surrounding the APE in such a way as to<br />

maintain options and opportunities for future use and enjoyment.<br />

<br />

The District, as trustee for the people of the State of California, will administer the tidelands to provide<br />

the greatest economic, social, and aesthetic benefits to current and future generations.<br />

The Proposed Action would adjust the existing runway threshold and glide slope to meet FAA criteria for<br />

airplane Approach Category D CAT I instrument approaches on Runway 9. The loss of this ability would have<br />

negative impacts on the region, as landings would not be permitted during poor visibility conditions and<br />

flights would be diverted to nearby airports. Consequently, the Proposed Action would not result in economic<br />

gains but would protect the <strong>San</strong> <strong>Diego</strong> area from economic losses. Additionally, the proposed improvement<br />

would not result in significant adverse aesthetic impacts to surrounding regions (see Section 4.13, Light<br />

Emissions and Visual Impacts). By protecting the local economy and avoiding negative aesthetic impacts, the<br />

Proposed Action would be consistent with the PMP goal to administer the tidelands area adjacent to and<br />

surrounding the APE to provide the greatest economic, social, and aesthetic benefits to present and future<br />

generations.<br />

<br />

District will integrate the tidelands into a functional regional transportation network.<br />

The Proposed Action would not impact or improve the existing surface transportation network, but would<br />

meet FAA criteria necessary to maintain a CAT I precision instrument approach by airplane Approach Category<br />

D aircraft necessary to preserve existing aircraft operations at the <strong>Airport</strong>.<br />

<br />

The District will enhance and maintain the Bay and tidelands as an attractive physical and biological<br />

entity.<br />

Physical attractiveness is not applicable in the case of a runway displaced threshold relocation that does not<br />

involve major construction and has no impact on existing buildings (see Section 4.13, Light Emissions and<br />

Visual Impacts). The relocation of runway lights and navigational aids off-<strong>Airport</strong> would occur at existing<br />

lighting locations and result in the removal of the two lighting stations farthest from the runway end, reducing<br />

off-<strong>Airport</strong> effects. The Proposed Action would be consistent with the PMP goal to enhance and maintain the<br />

Bay and tidelands area adjacent to and surrounding the Study Area as an attractive physical and biological<br />

entity.<br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EA</strong><br />

Environmental Consequences<br />

[4-9]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!