23.11.2014 Views

High-Performance Partnerships - National Academy of Public ...

High-Performance Partnerships - National Academy of Public ...

High-Performance Partnerships - National Academy of Public ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESULTS<br />

chapter four<br />

4. Define results that are important to the<br />

partners, community, and funders.<br />

Most public/nonpr<strong>of</strong>it partnerships are not<br />

blessed with self-sustaining funding sources. It<br />

is imperative that they achieve results important<br />

to funders and the community at large.<br />

Key stakeholders must conclude that their<br />

return on investment warrants the time and<br />

resources devoted to the collaborative effort.<br />

5. Low risk means low success.<br />

The public sector generally is risk adverse, and<br />

for good reason. Government must be a steward<br />

<strong>of</strong> the public’s interests and tax dollars.<br />

However, partnerships that avoid all risk will<br />

not realize their full potential. They must be<br />

willing to take reasonable, informed risks that<br />

are designed to achieve significant results.<br />

Otherwise, their success can only be so great.<br />

If the initiative does not work, partnerships<br />

should be prepared to evaluate what happened,<br />

retool, and try again.<br />

6. Use research on best practices.<br />

<strong>Partnerships</strong> benefit enormously by studying<br />

the successes and failures <strong>of</strong> other communities<br />

that deal with similar concerns. <strong>Public</strong><br />

organizations at every level—federal, regional,<br />

state, and local—provide excellent research on<br />

a wide range <strong>of</strong> public policy issues. Each sector<br />

has organizations that can provide best<br />

practices data for defining appropriate objectives<br />

and outcomes and assisting implementation<br />

strategies. The partnership may use neutral<br />

parties to facilitate the selection <strong>of</strong> measures<br />

and evaluation processes.<br />

In the City <strong>of</strong> Des Moines, debate continues over how<br />

data should be interpreted. If there is an increase in<br />

police calls from a neighborhood, does this mean there is<br />

more crime or greater awareness and reporting due to<br />

an <strong>of</strong>ficer being assigned there? If calls decrease, does<br />

this mean the neighborhood is safer or that calls are<br />

being directed to the NBSD <strong>of</strong>ficer? The likelihood is<br />

that data must be tracked for several years before they<br />

can be meaningfully interpreted.<br />

Neighborhood Based Service Delivery (Des Moines)<br />

AVAILABILITY OF ACCURATE,TIMELY<br />

DATA TO MEASURE RESULTS<br />

The Challenges<br />

Once a partnership identifies its results, it<br />

must adequately measure performance. Yet<br />

securing accurate and timely data can be problematic.<br />

One challenge is the lack <strong>of</strong> sufficient<br />

baseline information to evaluate current conditions.<br />

This frequently causes communities<br />

and organizations to embrace a policy or program<br />

based on anecdotal information. One<br />

example is a partnership that uses juvenile<br />

arrest statistics to measure the reducing juvenile<br />

crime goal. This measure may capture the<br />

police department’s effectiveness in apprehending<br />

criminals, not the true number <strong>of</strong><br />

juvenile crimes. Raw data can be difficult to<br />

interpret without considering the context, so a<br />

partnership must avoid the temptation to<br />

define its objectives based primarily on those<br />

data alone.<br />

Important community outcomes <strong>of</strong>ten are difficult<br />

to quantify, at least on a timely basis.<br />

<strong>High</strong> data gathering costs may cause a partnership<br />

to rely on information collected for general<br />

community purposes, such as the Census.<br />

Unfortunately, definitive results every decade<br />

are not sufficient to evaluate partnership performance<br />

and make midcourse corrections.<br />

For example, Neighborhoods in Bloom identified<br />

increased home ownership as a critical success<br />

measure. Other than decennial census<br />

information, however, homeownership data<br />

were not available on a reliable basis. As a result,<br />

the city’s ability to accurately measure its impact<br />

on ownership rates proved challenging.<br />

Even with quantifiable information, reporting<br />

timelines and formats may be different. The<br />

partnership must be aware <strong>of</strong> the general availability<br />

<strong>of</strong> data, and the partners’ willingness<br />

and ability to record them in a consistent and<br />

timely manner. Complexity further increases<br />

when the data come from different organizational<br />

systems, raising the “my computer doesn’t<br />

talk to your computer” syndrome. When a<br />

partnership’s purpose is human services-related,<br />

confidentiality <strong>of</strong> information can be an<br />

obstacle, as well.<br />

70 Powering the Future: <strong>High</strong>-<strong>Performance</strong> <strong>Partnerships</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!