26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11. Whether a condemning corporation or entity should be allowed to<br />

assign, transfer or sell its interest in the condemned property to a limited<br />

liability entity of any kind.<br />

15. How the condemnee and the public can have input into the process of<br />

determining what is a safe, convenient location for the right-of-way.<br />

16. Whether the current burden of proof in a condemnation proceeding<br />

should always be on the condemnor.<br />

17. Whether the condemnor should be required to confine its activities to<br />

the right-of-way obtained.<br />

18. Whether compensation for the land condemned should be a multiple of<br />

the fair market value as determined by a jury in order to abate the failing of<br />

lump sum payments as fair compensation for future injury.<br />

19 Whether the condemnor should assume all liability for the land<br />

condemned; and whether the condemnee should have to assume any.<br />

20. Whether the condemnee should automatically receive access across the<br />

condemned property when hislher property is bisected.<br />

2 1. Whether the condemnee should be reimbursed for property damages<br />

incurred by establishment and contiming operations of a right-of-way.<br />

22. Whether condemnation should be allowed on any property that contains<br />

sites listed or proposed to be listed in the National Historic Register.<br />

23. Whether written notice should be provided to affected landowners of a<br />

need determination request or hearing by government officials.<br />

n. WORKPLAN AND TIMELINE.<br />

A. Comparison of Statutes from Other States<br />

The comparable study should be expanded to include representative state<br />

laws from the major geographic areas of the U.S. In particular, NPRC<br />

suggests EQC study the Constitution and eminent domain statute in<br />

Alabama, which prohibits the use of eminent domain by private entities<br />

except in certain instances. In any case, we believe limiting the review of<br />

statutes to only western states may dismiss constructive solutions to the<br />

problems of eminent domain utilized by other, more populous, regions of<br />

the country.<br />

-98- <strong>Volume</strong> Ill: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Comment</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!