Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcommittee immediately<br />
draft legislation, which does the following thirrgs:<br />
Makes sure projects are in the public interest before private companies<br />
use eminent domain. When a private company wants to use eminent<br />
domain, it should have to prove its project is in the public interest.<br />
(Gabian)<br />
I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the s~.~bcommittee immediately<br />
draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />
Makes sure projects are in the public interest before private compar~ies<br />
use eminent domain. When a private corrlpany wants to use eminent<br />
domain, it should have to prove its project is in the public interest. (Dye)<br />
I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcommittee immediately<br />
draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />
Makes sure projects are in the public interest before private companies<br />
use eminent domain. When a private company wants to use eminent<br />
domain, it should have to prove its project is in the public interest.<br />
(Mangus)<br />
I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcommittee immediately<br />
draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />
Makes sure projects are in the public interest before private companies<br />
use eminent domain. When a private company wants to use eminent<br />
domain, it should have to prove its project is in the public interest. Under<br />
current eminent domain laws, companies can come on our land and<br />
prospect for clay, gravel, and "other materials," which might include<br />
water. This is wrong and should be changed. (In. Alderson)<br />
Eminent Domain Statutes in General<br />
We support the Subcommittee's attempt in LC7032 to modernize the language.<br />
(Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railway Company, Conoco, and the<br />
<strong>Montana</strong> Power Company)<br />
Cenex supports the findings and recommendations of the study, as presented<br />
in Chapter 7 of the draft Report. (Cenex)<br />
We agree with the finding and draft recommendation as outlined in the report.<br />
(W ETA)<br />
EQC Eminent Domain Study -53-
Change language