26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Montana</strong> Petroleum Association believes the Subcommittee's "Findings" and<br />

"Draft Recommendations" fairly represent and balance the evidence presented<br />

to the Subcommittee. (MPA)<br />

Further, the LC Draft 7030 of the proposed legislation, there are several<br />

concerns. The Department's legal staff is still analyzing the various pieces of<br />

legislation and is concerned that what the Code Commissioner draft may<br />

consider as only-changes in style and grammar may not exactly equate to what<br />

has been happening in the courts over the last several years and thus be more<br />

substantive. 'The Department will reserve the right to submit more specific<br />

comments on the proposed legislation as it develops. (<strong>Montana</strong> Department of<br />

Transportation)<br />

The Tongue River Railroad Company is in the process of obtaining all<br />

necessary permits, easements and right-of-way approvals. We have examined<br />

the existing eminent domain statutes and have followed the Subcommittee<br />

deliberations with interest. The cleaning up and clarification of ambiguous and<br />

dated language makes sense and we support the lang~rage contained in LC<br />

7032. (Tongue River Railroad)<br />

We support the draft leg is la ti or^ LC 7032, which seeks to modernize language<br />

of <strong>Montana</strong> eminent domain law. LC 7032 represents a significant, positive<br />

step toward fostering a clearer understanding of these statutes. (<strong>Montana</strong><br />

Electric Cooperatives' Association)<br />

Handbook<br />

As I have commented before, landowners do not need a slick brochure to<br />

educate them of their rights. I find this idea (by industry) insulting. Landowners<br />

are at a disadvantage in condemnation proceedings, as statewide public<br />

comment has shown. We know our rights, or the lack of, and that is why this<br />

subcommittee exists. (McRae)<br />

We believe that a handbook on eminent domain will be a great benefit to the<br />

State and its citizens. As the Subcommittee is aware, eminent domain is highly<br />

technical and confusing, therefore dissemination of information to the public will<br />

most achieve the goal of HJR 34. (Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railway<br />

Company, Conoco, and the <strong>Montana</strong> Power Company)<br />

Finally, we notice that the "Handbook" row of the Findings and Draft<br />

Recommendations matrix (Chapter 7, Figure 7) has been left blank. We<br />

support the development of a handbook that is factual, objective, and that can<br />

-54- <strong>Volume</strong> Ill: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Comment</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!