26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Since the need for the product can adequately be provided<br />

without the pipeline across <strong>Montana</strong>, there really is no<br />

public need, thus the Yellowstone Pipeline C'ompany has no<br />

legal right to the power of eminent domain.<br />

The use of the power of eminent domain as presently<br />

enforced, results in a very unfair situation for the small<br />

private landowner. If the landowner doesn't wish a company<br />

with this power to gain right of way access through their<br />

property, and/or can't come to agreement as to the<br />

appropriate monetary settlement, the company can-condemn.<br />

The landowner would be granted a one-time payment for a<br />

narrow strip of land across his property based on the area<br />

of land involved and the present value per unit measure of<br />

land area at the land's present use.<br />

Even though the land may have a much higher potential value<br />

as a truck garden, ornamental nursery, orchard, residential<br />

subdivision, or commercial development, the land would still<br />

be valued at its present use, and the great encumbrance,<br />

and/or potential degradation of the landowner's property<br />

from disturbance, pollution, and obstruction to development<br />

of surrounding property is completely ignored.<br />

Liquid petroleum pipelines often cross major rivers.<br />

Crossings may be by ditching, by overhead pipe (like a<br />

suspension bridge) or by directional drilling under the<br />

river. In the latter two cases, the company must make a<br />

major investment, and the impact on the land is great. The<br />

presence of an overhead structure is obviously a great.<br />

source of visual pollution, while the directional drilling<br />

approach requires a great deal of soil and land disturbance,<br />

and if a pipe rupture should ever occur, a great source of<br />

pollution to the ground and the aquifer.<br />

Once a company has been granted the power of eminent domain,<br />

as applied to a liquid fuel pipeline company, the law must<br />

provide for landowner rights to:<br />

1. Assure that he/she can require the best "state of the<br />

artn environmental and safety requirements such as the<br />

latest in leak detection technology; double walled pipe<br />

constructed of 1/2" steel plate; closely spaced block<br />

valves; internal pipeline inspection at least every 2 years;<br />

hydrostatic testing for pipeline integrity over any and all<br />

aquifers and wet-areas-every 2 years; and regular visual<br />

inspections - aerial and walking every 2 weeks.;<br />

2. The company post a bond sufficient to return the land to<br />

its full productive capacity and visual and/or aesthetic<br />

qualities both at the completion of the installation and for<br />

the life of the facility and beyond through abandonment.<br />

EQC Eminent Domain Study -83-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!