Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Since the need for the product can adequately be provided<br />
without the pipeline across <strong>Montana</strong>, there really is no<br />
public need, thus the Yellowstone Pipeline C'ompany has no<br />
legal right to the power of eminent domain.<br />
The use of the power of eminent domain as presently<br />
enforced, results in a very unfair situation for the small<br />
private landowner. If the landowner doesn't wish a company<br />
with this power to gain right of way access through their<br />
property, and/or can't come to agreement as to the<br />
appropriate monetary settlement, the company can-condemn.<br />
The landowner would be granted a one-time payment for a<br />
narrow strip of land across his property based on the area<br />
of land involved and the present value per unit measure of<br />
land area at the land's present use.<br />
Even though the land may have a much higher potential value<br />
as a truck garden, ornamental nursery, orchard, residential<br />
subdivision, or commercial development, the land would still<br />
be valued at its present use, and the great encumbrance,<br />
and/or potential degradation of the landowner's property<br />
from disturbance, pollution, and obstruction to development<br />
of surrounding property is completely ignored.<br />
Liquid petroleum pipelines often cross major rivers.<br />
Crossings may be by ditching, by overhead pipe (like a<br />
suspension bridge) or by directional drilling under the<br />
river. In the latter two cases, the company must make a<br />
major investment, and the impact on the land is great. The<br />
presence of an overhead structure is obviously a great.<br />
source of visual pollution, while the directional drilling<br />
approach requires a great deal of soil and land disturbance,<br />
and if a pipe rupture should ever occur, a great source of<br />
pollution to the ground and the aquifer.<br />
Once a company has been granted the power of eminent domain,<br />
as applied to a liquid fuel pipeline company, the law must<br />
provide for landowner rights to:<br />
1. Assure that he/she can require the best "state of the<br />
artn environmental and safety requirements such as the<br />
latest in leak detection technology; double walled pipe<br />
constructed of 1/2" steel plate; closely spaced block<br />
valves; internal pipeline inspection at least every 2 years;<br />
hydrostatic testing for pipeline integrity over any and all<br />
aquifers and wet-areas-every 2 years; and regular visual<br />
inspections - aerial and walking every 2 weeks.;<br />
2. The company post a bond sufficient to return the land to<br />
its full productive capacity and visual and/or aesthetic<br />
qualities both at the completion of the installation and for<br />
the life of the facility and beyond through abandonment.<br />
EQC Eminent Domain Study -83-