26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While we don't believe this legislation is needed, we offer several suggestions<br />

to LC7033 should you decide to pursue it and trust you will give them serious<br />

consideration.<br />

1. Specify that this applies only to easements.<br />

2. Specify that this section is not intended to in any way hinder or stop<br />

the deployment of any telecommunications or other service delivered<br />

over any telecommunications facility. (Although we're not sure that<br />

addresses some applications, such as internet services that are now<br />

being transmitted over existing electric lines.)<br />

3. Delete the prospective clause to avoid undoing 100 plus years of<br />

court orders and starting all over again to define what a telephone or<br />

telegraph line means.<br />

4. Clear up the ambiguous reference to 70-30-1 1 1(3)<br />

(US West)<br />

If a project is approved (railroad, pipeline, power line, etc) that permit should<br />

only be for the single use it was intended. It is not right for company to use a<br />

right of way for something else without negotiation with the original landowner.<br />

An example would be laying fiber optic cable in an existing right of way. The<br />

fiber optic company would negotiate with the original landowner, not the holder<br />

of the current right of way. (McRae)<br />

We support the draft recommendations contained in Chapter 7, although we<br />

are concerned about the need for LC7033, draft legislation dealing with use of<br />

condemned property for other uses. (<strong>Montana</strong> Electric Cooperatives'<br />

Association)<br />

The power of eminent domain should be limited to the taking of a single-use<br />

easement. If the holder of the easement wants to use or lease the land for<br />

additional projects (adding a pipeline to a railroad easement for example), the<br />

landowner must have the right to require the holder to renegotiate the<br />

easement. This right exists under Wyoming law. (Northern Plains Resource<br />

Council)<br />

Due Process<br />

We support the recommendation. (Burlington Northern and Sante Fe Railway<br />

Company, Conoco, and the <strong>Montana</strong> Power Company)<br />

Cenex supports the findings and recommendations of the study, as presented<br />

in Chapter 7 of the draft Report. (Cenex)<br />

EQC Eminent Domain Study -37-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!