26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Northern Plains Resource Council<br />

Memorandum<br />

TO:<br />

CC:<br />

FROM:<br />

Representative Monica Lindeen<br />

Environmental Quality Council<br />

. Krista Lee<br />

Legislative Environmental Policy Office<br />

Aaron Browning<br />

imon.bro~nin*cmt.org,<br />

DATE: Monday, January 3 1,2000<br />

RE:<br />

Liability Issues Related to Easements Acquired through the Power of Eminent<br />

Domain<br />

Per your request I am submitting this memo, which outlines some of NPRC's concerns<br />

regarding landowner liability when a condemning authority acquires private property<br />

through the power of eminent domain.<br />

As you know, the 1999 <strong>Legislature</strong> debated the merits of HB 355, by Taylor, Lindeen,<br />

Raney, Jabs, Bookout-Reineke, Hanson and others, "AN ACT PROVIDING THAT M<br />

AN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING ... A PRIVATE PERSON OR ENTITY<br />

CLAIMING THAT A GREATER INTEREST THAN AN EASEMENT IS<br />

NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE USE SHALL SHOW BY CLEAR AND<br />

CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE GREATER INTEREST SOUGHT IS<br />

NECESSARY ..." The House Committee on Business and Labor tabled the bill.<br />

During the public hearing on HB 355 and subsequent deliberation by the Committee,<br />

issues related to liability were raised. In general, opponents of the bill argued that<br />

property interests acquired through eminent domain should not be limited to easements<br />

because landowners would be held liable, especially under federal Superhnd law, if they<br />

retained title and a spill occured. Supporters of the bill, including NPRC, <strong>Montana</strong><br />

Farmers Union and <strong>Montana</strong> Farm Bureau, argued that the type of interest taken was<br />

irrelevant with regards to liability. Supporters also argued that even if landowners might<br />

be held liable, it should be their choice, not the State's, as whether to incur that liability.<br />

However, we were also concerned about liability, and wanted to be sure landowners were<br />

indemnified and held harmless by condemning authorities. Because of the points raised<br />

by opponents we added a new Section 1 to HB 355 during drafting which read:<br />

240 1 <strong>Montana</strong> Avenue Suite # 200 Billings, <strong>Montana</strong> 59 10 1-2336<br />

Phone: (406) 248- 1154 Fax: (4060 248-2 110 E-mail: infoG?nprcmt.org Web:<br />

http:/ /www.nprcmt.org<br />

EQC Eminent Domain Study -85-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!