Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Northern Plains Resource Council<br />
Memorandum<br />
TO:<br />
CC:<br />
FROM:<br />
Representative Monica Lindeen<br />
Environmental Quality Council<br />
. Krista Lee<br />
Legislative Environmental Policy Office<br />
Aaron Browning<br />
imon.bro~nin*cmt.org,<br />
DATE: Monday, January 3 1,2000<br />
RE:<br />
Liability Issues Related to Easements Acquired through the Power of Eminent<br />
Domain<br />
Per your request I am submitting this memo, which outlines some of NPRC's concerns<br />
regarding landowner liability when a condemning authority acquires private property<br />
through the power of eminent domain.<br />
As you know, the 1999 <strong>Legislature</strong> debated the merits of HB 355, by Taylor, Lindeen,<br />
Raney, Jabs, Bookout-Reineke, Hanson and others, "AN ACT PROVIDING THAT M<br />
AN EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDING ... A PRIVATE PERSON OR ENTITY<br />
CLAIMING THAT A GREATER INTEREST THAN AN EASEMENT IS<br />
NECESSARY TO ACCOMPLISH THE USE SHALL SHOW BY CLEAR AND<br />
CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE GREATER INTEREST SOUGHT IS<br />
NECESSARY ..." The House Committee on Business and Labor tabled the bill.<br />
During the public hearing on HB 355 and subsequent deliberation by the Committee,<br />
issues related to liability were raised. In general, opponents of the bill argued that<br />
property interests acquired through eminent domain should not be limited to easements<br />
because landowners would be held liable, especially under federal Superhnd law, if they<br />
retained title and a spill occured. Supporters of the bill, including NPRC, <strong>Montana</strong><br />
Farmers Union and <strong>Montana</strong> Farm Bureau, argued that the type of interest taken was<br />
irrelevant with regards to liability. Supporters also argued that even if landowners might<br />
be held liable, it should be their choice, not the State's, as whether to incur that liability.<br />
However, we were also concerned about liability, and wanted to be sure landowners were<br />
indemnified and held harmless by condemning authorities. Because of the points raised<br />
by opponents we added a new Section 1 to HB 355 during drafting which read:<br />
240 1 <strong>Montana</strong> Avenue Suite # 200 Billings, <strong>Montana</strong> 59 10 1-2336<br />
Phone: (406) 248- 1154 Fax: (4060 248-2 110 E-mail: infoG?nprcmt.org Web:<br />
http:/ /www.nprcmt.org<br />
EQC Eminent Domain Study -85-