26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

up front. State and federal governments do not give fee title to public land for<br />

the railroad. The railroad doesn't get to own public land, but they want to own<br />

our private property by taking fee title through eminent domain. They want this<br />

so the railroad can have equity to borrow money to finance their operations.<br />

This is wrong. Financing should never be a reason why someone can get fee<br />

title. (Boulware)<br />

Eminent domain4aw should not in any way allow a condemnor to take ,title to<br />

property ~~nless the landowner is willing to do this. 'There are other ways to<br />

grant rights of ways than giving a title -- such as leases, which could include<br />

yearly royalty payments. This is much more fair than a one time payment for<br />

property. (Crandall)<br />

Under the present system, one easement or fee title taking opens up the land<br />

for every other possible taking, and creates no recourse for landowners to deal<br />

with additional uses from other parties. (McKinney)<br />

<strong>Montana</strong>'s private landowners should have the same rights as those granted to<br />

the State, Federal and Tribal governments. This should include the ability to<br />

negotiate easements and adequate mitigations. (Hayes)<br />

I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcommittee immediately<br />

draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />

Lets landowners give an easement, rather than deed. (Gabrian)<br />

I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcommittee immediately<br />

draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />

Lets landowners give an easement, rather than deed. We would feel<br />

terrible if the airport was abandoned and we would have a hole in our<br />

land that belonged to someone else. (Dye)<br />

I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcommittee immediately<br />

draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />

Lets landowners give an easement, rather than deed. We would feel<br />

terrible if the airport was abandoned and we would have a hole in our<br />

land that belonged to someone else. (Mangus)<br />

I support eminent domain reform. I suggest that the subcorrrrnittee immediately<br />

draft legislation, which does the following things:<br />

Lets landowners give an easement, rather than deed. (In. Alderson)<br />

The law must explicitly give landowners the right to choose whether to sell an<br />

easement rather than title for the land that is used. A condemnor wishing to<br />

EQC Eminent Domain Study -45-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!