Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EQC Eminent Domain<br />
Subcommittee-<strong>Public</strong> Hearing<br />
March 23.2000<br />
Exhibit 4<br />
CHARTER LIVESTOCK<br />
Steve & Jeanne Charter<br />
13838 Hwy 87 N, Shepherd, MT 59079<br />
1-406-947-2151, Fax 1-406-947-2152<br />
Eminant Domain Subcommittee<br />
<strong>Montana</strong> Environmental Quality Council<br />
Thursday, March 23, 2000<br />
My name is Jeanne Charter. Part of our ranch<br />
borders Highway 87 North towards Roundup about 15 miles<br />
out of Billings. The two big high voltage powerlines<br />
from Colstrip 3 & 4 cross us.<br />
We went through condemnation proceedings over the<br />
damage compensation award for this right-of-way in the<br />
late 1970's. MPC really low-balled us on their offer,<br />
proposing only large tract grazing land prices. We<br />
ended up being awarded 10 TIMES what the company<br />
offered by the 3-man condemnation panel. The panel<br />
recognized both our concerns that 1) the right-of-way<br />
involved only a small tract and 2) that the big power<br />
lines damaged property values for subdivision to the<br />
adjoining property.<br />
Most landowners are very reluctant to go to court;<br />
condemning companies use that to their unfair<br />
advantage. We believe EQC should recommend that the<br />
eminant domain law be amended to grant landowners the<br />
right to third party arbitration of both monetary<br />
damages and also individual tract right-of-way<br />
centerline routing prior to condemnation in court.<br />
Judging from our experience, condemning companies would<br />
be much more reasonable about routing and price if they<br />
had to explain the fairness of their offer to a neutral<br />
third party. The cost of arbitration should be paid by<br />
the party seeking to condemn property.<br />
One other proposal we made in court that we did<br />
not prevail on was to be awarded annual right-of-way<br />
payments at industrial lease rates. We feel this<br />
option should be amended into the eminant domain<br />
statute as well. If industrial use is made of<br />
property, industrial rental rates should be paid. If<br />
this raises consumer costs somewhat, so be it. Private<br />
landowners should not be expected to subsidize other<br />
businesses1 profits or consumer prices.<br />
-146- <strong>Volume</strong> Ill: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Comment</strong>