26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EQC Eminent Domain<br />

Subcommittee-<strong>Public</strong> Hearing<br />

March 23.2000<br />

Exhibit 4<br />

CHARTER LIVESTOCK<br />

Steve & Jeanne Charter<br />

13838 Hwy 87 N, Shepherd, MT 59079<br />

1-406-947-2151, Fax 1-406-947-2152<br />

Eminant Domain Subcommittee<br />

<strong>Montana</strong> Environmental Quality Council<br />

Thursday, March 23, 2000<br />

My name is Jeanne Charter. Part of our ranch<br />

borders Highway 87 North towards Roundup about 15 miles<br />

out of Billings. The two big high voltage powerlines<br />

from Colstrip 3 & 4 cross us.<br />

We went through condemnation proceedings over the<br />

damage compensation award for this right-of-way in the<br />

late 1970's. MPC really low-balled us on their offer,<br />

proposing only large tract grazing land prices. We<br />

ended up being awarded 10 TIMES what the company<br />

offered by the 3-man condemnation panel. The panel<br />

recognized both our concerns that 1) the right-of-way<br />

involved only a small tract and 2) that the big power<br />

lines damaged property values for subdivision to the<br />

adjoining property.<br />

Most landowners are very reluctant to go to court;<br />

condemning companies use that to their unfair<br />

advantage. We believe EQC should recommend that the<br />

eminant domain law be amended to grant landowners the<br />

right to third party arbitration of both monetary<br />

damages and also individual tract right-of-way<br />

centerline routing prior to condemnation in court.<br />

Judging from our experience, condemning companies would<br />

be much more reasonable about routing and price if they<br />

had to explain the fairness of their offer to a neutral<br />

third party. The cost of arbitration should be paid by<br />

the party seeking to condemn property.<br />

One other proposal we made in court that we did<br />

not prevail on was to be awarded annual right-of-way<br />

payments at industrial lease rates. We feel this<br />

option should be amended into the eminant domain<br />

statute as well. If industrial use is made of<br />

property, industrial rental rates should be paid. If<br />

this raises consumer costs somewhat, so be it. Private<br />

landowners should not be expected to subsidize other<br />

businesses1 profits or consumer prices.<br />

-146- <strong>Volume</strong> Ill: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Comment</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!