Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Impact Analysis Studies and Proposed Mitigation Approach -Page 8<br />
Therefore, it is imperative to begin recruiting a cooperating university and screening<br />
prospective students as soon as possible, preferably before the end of April 2000.<br />
Mitigation of Potential Losses<br />
Acceptable production levels will be established via an examination of historical<br />
performance, the results of the baseline studies, and the final design of the statistical<br />
model. MT DFWP will identi@ a range of unacceptable impacts based on comparing<br />
current production with the predicted range of production levels from the statistical<br />
model developed as part of the proposed studies. The exact amount of reduction in<br />
production success required to trigger mitigation will be determined by the mitigation<br />
committee (described in 4.1 below), after the baseline studies are completed and the<br />
'. statistical model is developed and tested. This document includes a preliminary set of<br />
mitigations outlining how TRRC will compensate the state for losses.<br />
4.1 Mitigation Committee<br />
A five-person mitigation committee will be assembled with # 1 and #3 (identified below)<br />
selected by MT DFW, #2 selected by TRR and #4 and #5 selected by either the<br />
Governor's office or a designee of that office. Members #4 and #5 will be compensated<br />
for transportation, lodging, and meals related to the committee activities, by TRRC.<br />
1. MT DFW representative (as a representative of the director<br />
and fisheries management at a state wide level).<br />
2. TRRC representative (to represent the interest of TRRC)<br />
3. MCFH (MT DFWP) representative. (A hatchery employee<br />
would have knowledge about hatchery operations, fish cultur'e,<br />
fish biology, and fish production that would be critical to any<br />
decision)<br />
4. University professor with regional experience in fisheries, fish<br />
culture, or fish hatchery management, (selected as described<br />
above *)<br />
5. Impartial member(se1ected as described above*), not<br />
associated with MT DFW or TRRC, or anyone who would<br />
have a conflict of interest.<br />
This committee will be the final clearing house for any study design; analysis and<br />
mitigation decisions regarding MCFH and is separate from the Railroad Task Force<br />
described in TRR<strong>III</strong>. In order to participate in the study design and ensure that the full<br />
two years of pre-construction data is collected, the committee needs to be appointed and<br />
activated before the spring 2000 hatchery season commences. It is MT DFWP's position<br />
that this mitigation plan should be clear and concise enough to allow most mitigation to<br />
proceed without the convening of a committee, but if there is a disagreement as to the<br />
magnitude of impact or necessary mitigation, then this committee will have binding<br />
jurisdiction. Decisions will be based on a simple majority rule. As stated before, MCFH<br />
EQC Eminent Domain Study -229-