26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Impact Analysis Studies and Proposed Mitigation Approach -Page 8<br />

Therefore, it is imperative to begin recruiting a cooperating university and screening<br />

prospective students as soon as possible, preferably before the end of April 2000.<br />

Mitigation of Potential Losses<br />

Acceptable production levels will be established via an examination of historical<br />

performance, the results of the baseline studies, and the final design of the statistical<br />

model. MT DFWP will identi@ a range of unacceptable impacts based on comparing<br />

current production with the predicted range of production levels from the statistical<br />

model developed as part of the proposed studies. The exact amount of reduction in<br />

production success required to trigger mitigation will be determined by the mitigation<br />

committee (described in 4.1 below), after the baseline studies are completed and the<br />

'. statistical model is developed and tested. This document includes a preliminary set of<br />

mitigations outlining how TRRC will compensate the state for losses.<br />

4.1 Mitigation Committee<br />

A five-person mitigation committee will be assembled with # 1 and #3 (identified below)<br />

selected by MT DFW, #2 selected by TRR and #4 and #5 selected by either the<br />

Governor's office or a designee of that office. Members #4 and #5 will be compensated<br />

for transportation, lodging, and meals related to the committee activities, by TRRC.<br />

1. MT DFW representative (as a representative of the director<br />

and fisheries management at a state wide level).<br />

2. TRRC representative (to represent the interest of TRRC)<br />

3. MCFH (MT DFWP) representative. (A hatchery employee<br />

would have knowledge about hatchery operations, fish cultur'e,<br />

fish biology, and fish production that would be critical to any<br />

decision)<br />

4. University professor with regional experience in fisheries, fish<br />

culture, or fish hatchery management, (selected as described<br />

above *)<br />

5. Impartial member(se1ected as described above*), not<br />

associated with MT DFW or TRRC, or anyone who would<br />

have a conflict of interest.<br />

This committee will be the final clearing house for any study design; analysis and<br />

mitigation decisions regarding MCFH and is separate from the Railroad Task Force<br />

described in TRR<strong>III</strong>. In order to participate in the study design and ensure that the full<br />

two years of pre-construction data is collected, the committee needs to be appointed and<br />

activated before the spring 2000 hatchery season commences. It is MT DFWP's position<br />

that this mitigation plan should be clear and concise enough to allow most mitigation to<br />

proceed without the convening of a committee, but if there is a disagreement as to the<br />

magnitude of impact or necessary mitigation, then this committee will have binding<br />

jurisdiction. Decisions will be based on a simple majority rule. As stated before, MCFH<br />

EQC Eminent Domain Study -229-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!