Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
January 23, 2000<br />
Krista Lee<br />
Environmental Quality Council<br />
P.O.Box 201704<br />
Helena, MT 59620-1704<br />
Re: Eminent Domain<br />
There are really three main issues. First is the issue of<br />
public interest. Yes, some services or commodities are<br />
delivered in the public interest to the public: electric<br />
power; gas for heating, cooking, and industry; domestic<br />
water supplies; and many railroad lines. The common thread<br />
to these examples is that at the receiving terminal,. the<br />
service or commodity is delivered to the public or to<br />
several unrelated parties (related neither to each other nor<br />
to the company transporting or developing the service or<br />
commodity).<br />
A service or commodity developed or transported by a company<br />
at a receiving terminal owned and operated by that same<br />
company or closely related company for that company's<br />
benefit is an example of a service or commodity that is not<br />
provided in the public interest. It is an example of a forprofit<br />
business transporting a service or commodity to their<br />
company owned and/or operated facility for the purpose of<br />
making a profit. Strictly a business proposition. A liquid<br />
petroleum pipeline immediately comes to mind as fitting this<br />
description.<br />
Since the latter described enterprise does not logically fit<br />
in as a public service nor in the public interest, it is not<br />
logical that it should be granted the power of eminent<br />
domain.<br />
The second issue is that of a public need for the service or<br />
commodity. All of the examples of services and commodities<br />
given above including liquid petroleum products, are needed<br />
by the public. However, some are obtainable from different<br />
sources which may have positives and negatives of economy,<br />
of environmental consequences, and of degree of<br />
satisfaction. In the case of liquid petroleum transport<br />
from eastern <strong>Montana</strong> to Washington State by Yellowstone<br />
Pipeline Company, alternative sources exist to provide the<br />
company terminals with product at a cost which is<br />
competitive with the eastern <strong>Montana</strong> supplied product. The<br />
only positive result of providing the product from eastern<br />
<strong>Montana</strong> by pipeline to eastern Washington is that of<br />
providing profit to the refinery, the pipeline company, and<br />
the company distributors.<br />
-82- <strong>Volume</strong> Ill: <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Comment</strong>