26.11.2014 Views

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Northern Plains Resource Council<br />

Good evening, Chairman Cole and members of the Joint Subcommittee. My name<br />

is Dena Hoff, and I am speaking to you tonight on behalf of the Northern Plains Resource<br />

Council, a three thousand-member organization of farmers, ranchers, and townspeople<br />

working to conserve <strong>Montana</strong>'s precious natural resources and promote family-based<br />

agriculture.<br />

First, on behalf of the members of NPRC, I would like to thank each one of you,<br />

Chairman Cole, Vice Chairwoman Gutsche, Representatives Lindeen, Shockley, McGee,<br />

Tash, and Gillan, Senator Stang, Mr. Ebzery, Mr. Sorenson and Ms. Page, for the hard<br />

work each of you have put into this study. We appreciate your support and work on<br />

behalf of ordinary <strong>Montana</strong>ns across the state.<br />

My husband Alvin and I farm near Glendive on the Yellowstone River, where we<br />

raise beans, corn, sheep and alfalfa. For twenty years, we have put our heart and souls<br />

into our land, and like many people across <strong>Montana</strong>, we don't like the idea that a big<br />

corpoxation can take our private property under the laws of this state, destroying<br />

everything that we have worked for so that some out-of-state profiteer can make a few<br />

bucks by building their pipeline, railroad, powerline, or other so-called "public use."<br />

As you can tell from the stickers you see on everyone's shirts, we are here this<br />

evening with one simple message: reform eminent domain - make it more fair.<br />

It is not enough to continue to study this outdated, antiquated statute without<br />

proposing meaninel reforms to help <strong>Montana</strong>'s rural landowners. It is not enough to<br />

only produce a booklet informing private property owners that, as we suspected, we have<br />

very little rights under the law. It is not enough to continue down this road to nowhere<br />

that opponents of private property rights protection would have us go.<br />

The eminent domain law is largely unchanged since it was written in 1877, before<br />

<strong>Montana</strong> was even a state, and it must go. Now is the time to make a decision between<br />

private property owners and the large corporations that would take our land.<br />

You have the opportunity today to do something remarkable. You can, in this<br />

economically depressed state, where personal income is 5 1 ", say to our number one<br />

ind~stry~~agriculture: "We will protect your number one asset - your land. We will not let<br />

eminent domain be abused, and we will close loopholes that threaten rural people."<br />

I want to speak directly about some of the eminent domain reforms we believe are<br />

most important.<br />

First and most important, is a redefinition of what currently constitutes the<br />

definition of public use. Section 70-30-102 of the code says that many things, including<br />

pipelines, railroads, mines, wharves. docks, telegraph lines, and sewage are public uses.<br />

EQC Eminent Domain Study -1 37-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!