Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
Public Comment. Volume III - Montana Legislature
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Northern Plains Resource Council<br />
Good evening, Chairman Cole and members of the Joint Subcommittee. My name<br />
is Dena Hoff, and I am speaking to you tonight on behalf of the Northern Plains Resource<br />
Council, a three thousand-member organization of farmers, ranchers, and townspeople<br />
working to conserve <strong>Montana</strong>'s precious natural resources and promote family-based<br />
agriculture.<br />
First, on behalf of the members of NPRC, I would like to thank each one of you,<br />
Chairman Cole, Vice Chairwoman Gutsche, Representatives Lindeen, Shockley, McGee,<br />
Tash, and Gillan, Senator Stang, Mr. Ebzery, Mr. Sorenson and Ms. Page, for the hard<br />
work each of you have put into this study. We appreciate your support and work on<br />
behalf of ordinary <strong>Montana</strong>ns across the state.<br />
My husband Alvin and I farm near Glendive on the Yellowstone River, where we<br />
raise beans, corn, sheep and alfalfa. For twenty years, we have put our heart and souls<br />
into our land, and like many people across <strong>Montana</strong>, we don't like the idea that a big<br />
corpoxation can take our private property under the laws of this state, destroying<br />
everything that we have worked for so that some out-of-state profiteer can make a few<br />
bucks by building their pipeline, railroad, powerline, or other so-called "public use."<br />
As you can tell from the stickers you see on everyone's shirts, we are here this<br />
evening with one simple message: reform eminent domain - make it more fair.<br />
It is not enough to continue to study this outdated, antiquated statute without<br />
proposing meaninel reforms to help <strong>Montana</strong>'s rural landowners. It is not enough to<br />
only produce a booklet informing private property owners that, as we suspected, we have<br />
very little rights under the law. It is not enough to continue down this road to nowhere<br />
that opponents of private property rights protection would have us go.<br />
The eminent domain law is largely unchanged since it was written in 1877, before<br />
<strong>Montana</strong> was even a state, and it must go. Now is the time to make a decision between<br />
private property owners and the large corporations that would take our land.<br />
You have the opportunity today to do something remarkable. You can, in this<br />
economically depressed state, where personal income is 5 1 ", say to our number one<br />
ind~stry~~agriculture: "We will protect your number one asset - your land. We will not let<br />
eminent domain be abused, and we will close loopholes that threaten rural people."<br />
I want to speak directly about some of the eminent domain reforms we believe are<br />
most important.<br />
First and most important, is a redefinition of what currently constitutes the<br />
definition of public use. Section 70-30-102 of the code says that many things, including<br />
pipelines, railroads, mines, wharves. docks, telegraph lines, and sewage are public uses.<br />
EQC Eminent Domain Study -1 37-