01.12.2014 Views

Pobierz plik - Grundtvig

Pobierz plik - Grundtvig

Pobierz plik - Grundtvig

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ability to apply modern communication and<br />

information technologies (computers, the Internet).<br />

The latter seems to be the most acute<br />

problem. Senior citizens have experienced a<br />

breakthrough rather than evolutionary technological<br />

progress. It should be noted that<br />

this problem relates to the present generation<br />

of seniors; the situation is dynamic and in<br />

15-20 years’ time senior citizens will enjoy basic<br />

competence in modern technologies which<br />

will tend to evolve rather than leapfrog.<br />

5. It is very important to persuade senior citizens<br />

that devoting one’s time and effort to represent<br />

the group’s interest makes sense. In<br />

other words, they may be successful in public<br />

life. Bearing this in mind it is worth noting<br />

that senior citizens are often unaware of their<br />

political power and they lack self-assurance,<br />

which are two prerequisites for efficiency. On<br />

top of that, they should be very aware of the<br />

fact that their personal situation depends on<br />

public welfare and hence it is hard to affect<br />

one’s life (pro domo sua attitude) without influencing<br />

public decision making (pro publico<br />

bono approach).<br />

6. Socially committed senior citizens tend to<br />

be representatives of the middle class. Good<br />

education, income and professional standing<br />

are conducive to civic involvement.<br />

One cannot disregard the differences in situations<br />

in the project countries. The most significant<br />

relate to:<br />

1. The number and quality of the existing structures<br />

representing senior citizens’ needs,<br />

which vary widely. The organisational structures<br />

are relatively robust in Germany, Switzerland<br />

and the UK while they are non-existent<br />

in Bulgaria, Italy and Poland. The German<br />

model is very well-developed, with structures<br />

formally coordinating specific organisations<br />

operating at municipalities, counties and on<br />

a national level. They have the status of ‘umbrella<br />

organisations’. For historical reasons, in<br />

Poland, attempts to build up structures superior<br />

to specific, individual initiatives or organisations<br />

are still unwelcome. This holds true at<br />

central, regional and local levels alike.<br />

2. The number and quality of the existing training<br />

programmes for senior citizens keen on<br />

representing the interest of their environment<br />

varies significantly from one country to another.<br />

3. The attitude of public authorities (local, regional<br />

and central) towards senior citizens.<br />

For example, in Germany, public monies (at<br />

the municipality, county, regional and central<br />

government level) regularly finance ongoing<br />

operations of the aforementioned coordinating<br />

structures. In Poland, the public administration’s<br />

policy is determined to co-finance<br />

projects only, and usually those lasting not<br />

longer than one year. Granting financial support<br />

to regular activities is considered pointless.<br />

This attitude, groundless in Polish conditions<br />

(justified in countries with effective<br />

mechanisms of non-public sponsoring) prevents<br />

the stability necessary for the developing<br />

activities.<br />

The situation in Poland<br />

An analysis of the situation in Poland conducted<br />

as part of the project and in cooperation with<br />

senior citizens leads to a conclusion that the following<br />

circumstances need to be highlighted:<br />

125

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!