30.12.2014 Views

Caspian Report - Issue 06 - Winter 2014

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ROBERT M. CUTLER<br />

30<br />

Günther Oettinger currently estimates<br />

that in the long run, the SGC could<br />

provide approximately 100 billion<br />

cubic meters per year (bcm/y) to EU<br />

countries, or a little less than 20% of<br />

current total consumption.<br />

ANOTHER PROPOSAL NOT FORMALLY INCLUDED IN<br />

THE SGC IS THE AZERBAIJAN-GEORGIA-ROMANIA<br />

INTERCONNECTOR (AGRI) PROJECT, WHICH WOULD<br />

TRANSIT AZERBAIJANI NATURAL GAS TO THE KULEVI<br />

TERMINAL ON THE BLACK SEA AND THEN BY TANKER TO<br />

CONSTANTA, ROMANIA.<br />

The Trans Anatolian Natural Gas<br />

Pipeline (commonly known by its<br />

Turkish initials, TANAP) has taken the<br />

place of the Anatolian segment of the<br />

planned Nabucco pipeline. As a joint<br />

Azerbaijani-Turkish project, it does<br />

not fall into the TEN-E framework of<br />

the EU. However, because it essentially<br />

replaces Nabucco’s role in transporting<br />

Azerbaijani gas to Europe would<br />

have done, it is generally included in<br />

references to the SGC and in estimates<br />

of the volumes of gas that the SGC may<br />

transport to Europe.<br />

The ITGI would have comprised the<br />

Interconnector Turkey-Greece (ITG)<br />

and the Interconnector Greece-Italy<br />

(IGI). The first of these has been<br />

constructed, and has been operational<br />

for some time. The anticipated IGI<br />

extension has now been replaced<br />

by the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP),<br />

which was also formally included in<br />

the SGC project.<br />

The White Stream project was a later<br />

addition to the SGC. This now-dormant<br />

project would have transported<br />

quantities of <strong>Caspian</strong> Basin natural gas<br />

from its arrival in Georgia, under the<br />

Black Sea to Romania. First proposed<br />

in 2005, the original thought was to<br />

transit Ukrainian waters and possibly<br />

to have a pumping station there,<br />

near Crimea. The possibility of gas<br />

delivery to the country itself became<br />

increasingly less likely towards the end<br />

of the 2000s. Plans were redrawn for<br />

an entirely underwater route across<br />

the seabed. Originally conceived as a<br />

mega-project depending on gas from<br />

Turkmenistan, the production and<br />

sale of which it sought to encourage,<br />

it was then scaled down to 8 bcm/y<br />

with the possibility of later scaling up<br />

to 16, 24 and 32 bcm/y as needed. The<br />

discovery of more gas in Azerbaijan’s<br />

offshore provinces in the <strong>Caspian</strong> Sea<br />

basin made this possible, but in the<br />

end, other proposals multiplied, and<br />

White Stream has been left on the<br />

drawing board.<br />

Another proposal not formally<br />

included in the SGC is the Azerbaijan-<br />

Georgia-Romania Interconnector<br />

(AGRI) project, which would transit<br />

Azerbaijani natural gas to the Kulevi<br />

terminal on the Black Sea and then by<br />

tanker to Constanta, Romania. The gas<br />

could be transported either as liquefied<br />

(LNG) or as compressed natural<br />

gas. A four-way protocol on realizing<br />

the AGRI project was signed in mid-<br />

February 2011 between Azerbaijan,<br />

Georgia, Hungary, and Romania.<br />

Hungary’s participation was taken<br />

as confirmation of the intention<br />

to construct the Arad-Szeged<br />

interconnector between Romania<br />

and Hungary. A “proof of concept”<br />

feasibility study for AGRI in 2010<br />

was successful and produced a cost<br />

estimate of between 1.2 billion and<br />

4.5 billion euros, according to three

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!