31.12.2014 Views

Ph.D. Program Guidebook - The University of Chicago Booth School ...

Ph.D. Program Guidebook - The University of Chicago Booth School ...

Ph.D. Program Guidebook - The University of Chicago Booth School ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Ph</strong>.D. <strong>Program</strong> <strong>Guidebook</strong> 2007-2008<br />

how. <strong>The</strong>re is no <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>Chicago</strong> GSB pedagogy for the classroom. Teachers are<br />

encouraged to tap their own individual talents and experiences. <strong>Chicago</strong> GSB<br />

believes students preparing for significant business careers benefit from exposure to<br />

different learning approaches.<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> classroom is a place <strong>of</strong> learning. Classrooms at <strong>Chicago</strong> GSB are a place for<br />

learning rather than teaching. Learning is not a spectator sport; powerful learning<br />

experiences require the commitment <strong>of</strong> both teachers and students. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

faculty is neither to entertain nor to win popularity contests. <strong>The</strong>ir chief aim is to<br />

formulate, organize, and communicate knowledge. <strong>The</strong> role <strong>of</strong> the students is to<br />

participate actively in the learning process rather than consume knowledge<br />

passively.<br />

3. Personal integrity. Both faculty and students are subject to the highest standards <strong>of</strong><br />

personal integrity in their interactions with <strong>Chicago</strong> GSB colleagues and with<br />

external constituencies. Intellectual integrity is at the heart <strong>of</strong> the academic process.<br />

Dishonesty threatens its survival. All participants are expected to adhere<br />

scrupulously to the norms established for standards <strong>of</strong> scholarship. Equally<br />

destructive <strong>of</strong> the academic process is intolerance <strong>of</strong> other people’s ideas, analyses,<br />

and perspectives.<br />

4. Continuous improvement. <strong>Chicago</strong> GSB is committed to continuous improvement<br />

<strong>of</strong> all aspects <strong>of</strong> the school’s learning environment. Faculty members are encouraged<br />

to view the classroom as a laboratory for the testing <strong>of</strong> cutting-edge, evolving<br />

knowledge and techniques. <strong>The</strong> continuous refinement <strong>of</strong> important and innovative<br />

ideas is preferred over the flawless presentation <strong>of</strong> outdated material. One way to<br />

measure the key elements <strong>of</strong> the learning environment is through the Course<br />

Evaluation Form. Each student completes this form during the tenth week <strong>of</strong> each<br />

quarter. Each student is requested to provide qualitative feedback to the instructor on<br />

the back <strong>of</strong> the form.<br />

Consistent with <strong>Chicago</strong> GSB’s long-standing empirical traditions, a commitment to<br />

continuous improvement necessarily requires the measurement <strong>of</strong> the key elements in the<br />

learning environment, the wide dissemination <strong>of</strong> the results throughout the institution, and<br />

the tracking <strong>of</strong> progress through time.<br />

Excellence in a learning environment is attainable only if faculty and students adhere to the<br />

ideals listed above. What follows is a set <strong>of</strong> specific expectations for both students and<br />

faculty that follow directly from those ideals. <strong>The</strong>se mutual expectations are neither trivial<br />

nor obvious. <strong>The</strong>y are not trivial because everyone must consistently attend to details and<br />

align attitudes with behavior in order to achieve excellence in the learning environment. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

are not obvious because <strong>of</strong> the diversity <strong>of</strong> cultures and prior experiences among the faculty<br />

and students.<br />

PLAGIARISM<br />

Students must not represent another’s work as their own. In the preparation <strong>of</strong> all papers and<br />

other written work, students should carefully distinguish between their own ideas and those<br />

that have been derived from other sources. Information and opinions drawn from whatever<br />

source are to be attributed specifically to their respective sources. Students should learn the<br />

proper forms <strong>of</strong> citation. Quotations must be properly placed within quotation marks and<br />

fully cited. In all cases where material or ideas presented are derived from a student’s reading<br />

and research, the source must be indicated. Students who submit work either not their own or<br />

without clear attribution to original sources will be subject to disciplinary action. Punishment<br />

rev. 7/2007 86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!