02.01.2015 Views

CONSERVATION OF ARABIAN GAZELLES - Nwrc.gov.sa

CONSERVATION OF ARABIAN GAZELLES - Nwrc.gov.sa

CONSERVATION OF ARABIAN GAZELLES - Nwrc.gov.sa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Again some questions, related to the validity of the different subspecies of G. gazella on the<br />

Arabian peninsula, and subsequent management options, arise.<br />

I) Should G. g. cora and G. g. gazella be considered as two valid subspecies<br />

2) How can we assess the subspecific status of the KKWRC collection In which geographic<br />

areas are these animals suitable for reintroduction, given the historical distribution of the<br />

different subspecies in Saudi Arabia<br />

3) What is the genetic distance between G. g. fara<strong>sa</strong>ni and G. g. cora Could we use the<br />

surplus animals of the Fara<strong>sa</strong>n Islands for reintroduction on the mainland <br />

4) What is the real taxonomic position of G. g. erlangeri Depending on this, is its<br />

protection a high priority<br />

Data synthesis<br />

- Natural history information: The mountain gazelle is more or less a sedentary species.<br />

Males are typically solitary and territorial and females live in small groups (Mendelssohn, 1974).<br />

They seem to have occupied a wide range of habitats of the Arabian peninsula, occurring at lower<br />

density in <strong>sa</strong>ndy areas (Thou less el of., 1991). Very little information is available on the biology and<br />

ecology of the different subspecies in Saudi Arabia.<br />

Different hypotheses have been proposed to explain the existence of the Fara<strong>sa</strong>n gazelle. The<br />

gazelles may have been isolated from the mainland during the last Ice Age about 15,000 years ago<br />

(Thou less and Al Bassri, 1991). This period represents quite a short time on the biological scale of<br />

evolutionary change (about 10,000 generations). Another hypothesis suggests that the population<br />

originated from a few founders brought in by fishermen to establish a primiti ve game ranching<br />

operation. In this case, the validity of the subspecies would be doubtful, because of the short period<br />

of time over which the speciation process has occurred. Genetic drift due to the founder effect could<br />

alone explain the morphological differences found between G. g. fara<strong>sa</strong>n; and G. g. cora. It is very<br />

likely that some introductions of gazelles have recently occurred from the mainland.<br />

- Range and distribution data: Two subspecies of G. gazella are distributed on a north·<br />

south axis, with G. g. gazella in Israel, Lebanon and Syria and G. g. cora in the Arabian peninsula.<br />

Considering ecological variations in this gradient and climatic changes, the concept of subspecies can<br />

be easily understood with adaptation to local conditions. However, data about the former distribution<br />

of G. gazella subspecies are very imprecise.<br />

Most of the museum specimens of the Arabian gazelle, G. g. cora, come from the western<br />

part of the country but reports exist from many other parts of the country as well (Thouless el aI.,<br />

1991 )<br />

- Morphometries: G. g. gazella is larger than G. g. cora. The coat is <strong>sa</strong>id to be lighter than<br />

in G. g. cora. The horns of G. g. cora are also more Iyrate and narrower across the base than in G. g.<br />

gazella (Groves, 1969).<br />

Al Bassri and Thouless (1988) conducted a study on the KKWRC mountain gazelle<br />

population. Measurements from eight skulls were compared with G. g. gazella and G. g. cora<br />

62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!