02.01.2015 Views

CONSERVATION OF ARABIAN GAZELLES - Nwrc.gov.sa

CONSERVATION OF ARABIAN GAZELLES - Nwrc.gov.sa

CONSERVATION OF ARABIAN GAZELLES - Nwrc.gov.sa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

museum specimens (data extracted from Groves, 1969). Their results seem to indicate that the G.<br />

gaze Ita population of KKWRC belongs to the Palestinian subspecies gazella.<br />

The description of G. g. fara<strong>sa</strong>ni is mainly based on skull measurements from a <strong>sa</strong>mple of 13<br />

specimens (or even less depending on the characters considered and the state of the skulls) that were<br />

compared with G. g. cora specimens from the British Museum of Natural History (Thou less and AI<br />

Bassri, 1991).<br />

With its small size and dark coat, G. g. erlangeri seems different from the other subspecies of<br />

G. gazella in its phenotypic appearance.<br />

- Cytogenetic analysis: So far, all the individuals from the subspecies studied (eight gazelta,<br />

eight cora, 22 erlangeri, three fara<strong>sa</strong>ni) have had the <strong>sa</strong>me diploid number by conventional staining:<br />

34 chromosomes for the females and 35 for the males (Vas<strong>sa</strong>r! el al., 1993a). Chromosomal<br />

polymorph isms have not been found in these taxa. This supports their assignment to the <strong>sa</strong>me<br />

species. Banding techniques also confirm that they all are closely related taxa (Vas<strong>sa</strong>r! el al., 1993a).<br />

- Protein electrophoresis: An allozyme study based on 18 loci showed that G. g. gazelta, G.<br />

g. cora, G. g. erlangeri and G. g. fara<strong>sa</strong>ni appear to be genetically similar. The levels of observed<br />

differences in allelic frequencies are similar to those observed between separate geographic<br />

populations in other ungulates considered as s~parate subspecies (Vas<strong>sa</strong>r! el al., 1994). These results<br />

support their classification as different subspecies of G. gazelta.<br />

- Restriction mapping of mitochondrial DNA: No data are currently available for the<br />

different subspecies of G. gazella.<br />

- Recommendations: Our knowledge about the different subspecies of G. gazelta is much<br />

weaker, and the subspecific level more complex, compared with rheem. There are a large number of<br />

subspecies of G. gazeIta, inhabiting a wide range of ecological conditions, and several relict<br />

populations occur. A reassessment of the validity of the different subspecies should be the first step<br />

in any reintroduction or restoclc.ing project.<br />

I) The genetic distance between G. g. gazella and G. g. cora and their status as distinct<br />

subspecies should be reassessed. Samples of G. g. gazelta should be obtained from the<br />

Palestinian populations. Samples of G. g. cora should be obtained from populations in the<br />

south-west of the Arabian peninsula and Oman. These <strong>sa</strong>mples should be compared with<br />

some taken from specimens from Al-Khunfah and Harrat ai-Harrah, to determine the<br />

subspecific status of the mountain gazelle populations found in these areas. Hairs, cell<br />

cultures, blood <strong>sa</strong>mples or organ <strong>sa</strong>mples could be used to extract and amplify the<br />

mitochondrial DNA.<br />

2) The genetic relationship between the KKWRC mountain gazelle herd and G. g. gazella<br />

should be studied using mitochondrial DNA techniques. According to the results of this<br />

study, the historical distribution limit berween G. g. cora and G. g. gazella and their<br />

subspecific status, a geographic range for the reintroduction of KKWRC animals should<br />

be defined - assuming reliable data can be gathered.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!