12.01.2015 Views

Editorial & Advisory Board - Acta Technica Corviniensis

Editorial & Advisory Board - Acta Technica Corviniensis

Editorial & Advisory Board - Acta Technica Corviniensis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ACTA TECHNICA CORVINIENSIS – Bulletin of Engineering<br />

Table 4. Analytical Result of Slopes<br />

in Morgenstern‐ Price Method<br />

Model No<br />

Factor of Safety<br />

Total volume<br />

(M 3 )<br />

Total Mass<br />

(Kg)<br />

Total Resistance<br />

Moment (KN. M)<br />

Total Activating<br />

Moment(KN. M)<br />

Total Resisting<br />

Force (KN)<br />

Total Activating<br />

Force (KN)<br />

Fig.2.d. XRD Data of Light Brown Soil [7]<br />

3 1.939 234.44 3265.7 45887 23664 1933 999.37<br />

6 1.844 275.44 3171.3 42075 22821 1689.3 916.44<br />

5 1.71 154.64 2059.8 28084 16426 1241.6 728.59<br />

4 1.689 154.64 1965.4 26471 15674 1169.2 694.81<br />

1 1.435 154.64 1826 20899 14562 922 644.85<br />

1050<br />

1000<br />

Model 3<br />

950<br />

Model 6<br />

Fig.2.e. XRD Data of Dark Brown Soil [7]<br />

Total Activating Force KN<br />

900<br />

850<br />

800<br />

750<br />

700<br />

650<br />

Model 1<br />

Model 5<br />

Model 4<br />

Sl.<br />

No<br />

54<br />

Fig.2.f. XRD Data of Dark Green Soil [7]<br />

Table 3 Experiments Results When Soil Is in<br />

Loose 0% Moisture Condition [9]<br />

Model No<br />

Zero %<br />

Moisture<br />

Content<br />

<br />

(KN/m 3 )<br />

Φ<br />

Degree<br />

C<br />

(KN/m 2 )<br />

1 1 0 11.808 38 0<br />

2 2 0 12.54 35 10<br />

3 3 0 13.93 36.5 14<br />

4 4 0 12.71 42 0<br />

5 5 0 13.32 42 0<br />

6 6 0 11.5 37 12<br />

7 7 0 12.11 36 0<br />

8 8 0 13.26 32 0<br />

9 9 0 11.38 35 0<br />

10 10 0 10.29 37 4<br />

11 11 0 10.9 36 0<br />

12 12 0 12.35 33 0<br />

13 13 0 11.5 35 0<br />

14 14 0 12.72 36 0<br />

15 15 0 11.5 35 0<br />

16 16 0 11.93 33 0<br />

17 17 0 12 35 0<br />

18 18 0 12.11 37 0<br />

19 19 0 11.02 35 0<br />

20 20 0 11.51 31 12<br />

21 21 0 12.42 35 0<br />

22 22 0 11.81 35 8<br />

23 23 0 13.32 34.5 0<br />

24 24 0 11.51 33 0<br />

25 25 0 12.72 34 0<br />

26 26 0 14.05 34 0<br />

27 27 0 12.11 32.5 0<br />

28 28 0 12.72 37 0<br />

29 29 0 12.72 34 6<br />

30 30 0 13.02 35.5 0<br />

31 31 0 11.2 37 0<br />

Total Activating Moment (KN.M)<br />

600<br />

1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0<br />

Factor of Safety<br />

Figure Fi 3. Total 3 T activating l A i i force F vs. VFactor F of safety f S f<br />

24000<br />

22000<br />

20000<br />

18000<br />

16000<br />

14000<br />

Model 1<br />

Model 5<br />

Model 4<br />

Model 6<br />

Model 3<br />

1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0<br />

Factor of Safety<br />

Figure 4. FiTotal 4 T activating l A i i moment M vs. VFactor F of fsafety<br />

S f<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The structure modeling is a step of any<br />

construction activities and it is fast, economic,<br />

trustable and easiest way of slope stability<br />

evaluation, and it is achieved if soil mixture<br />

mineralogy identified<br />

<br />

Soil angle of friction, cohesive and unit weight<br />

have positive correlation with slope factor of<br />

safety<br />

2012. Fascicule 2 [April–June]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!