15.01.2015 Views

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Arkansas</strong> Animal Science Department Report 2001<br />

Statistical analysis. Total collection data were analyzed<br />

by least squares analysis <strong>of</strong> variance as a randomized design<br />

with three treatments. The effect <strong>of</strong> ionophore was examined.<br />

All data were analyzed using the Fit Least Squares procedures<br />

<strong>of</strong> JMP (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Orthogonal contrasts<br />

were used to compare control versus monensin and<br />

control versus lasalocid. Each lamb represented an experimental<br />

unit resulting in six replications per dietary treatment.<br />

An additional orthogonal contrast was used to compare<br />

changes in tissue mineral concentration between the lambs<br />

that were initially harvested versus lambs that continued on<br />

the study and were fed the high P hay.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Phosphorus. There was no difference (P > 0.10) in P<br />

metabolism (Table 3) between the monensin-fed lambs and<br />

the control lambs. Lasalocid supplementation tended to<br />

increase (P < 0.10) the fecal excretion <strong>of</strong> P when compared to<br />

control lambs (2.58 vs. 2.34 g/d). Monensin or lasalocid did<br />

not alter (P > 0.10) the apparent absorption or retention <strong>of</strong> P<br />

in this experiment. Kirk et al. (1994) also found no differences<br />

in the apparent absorption and retention <strong>of</strong> P in wether<br />

lambs fed monensin or lasalocid. Starnes et al. (1984) and<br />

Kirk et al. (1985b), however, found that monensin and lasalocid<br />

did increase the apparent absorption and retention <strong>of</strong> P.<br />

While those studies involved ruminants fed high-concentrate<br />

diets, Spears et al. (1989) found that monensin and lysocellin<br />

increased the apparent absorption <strong>of</strong> P in steers fed greenchop<br />

fescue diets.<br />

There were no differences (P > 0.10) in heart or rumen<br />

P concentrations (Table 4). Initially harvested lambs had<br />

lower liver (P < 0.01), kidney (P < 0.05), and muscle (P <<br />

0.10) P concentrations than the average <strong>of</strong> lambs that were<br />

fed the three dietary treatments. Monensin supplementation<br />

increased (P < 0.05) spleen and muscle concentrations <strong>of</strong> P<br />

and decreased (P < 0.05) bone concentrations <strong>of</strong> P when compared<br />

to control lambs. Kirk et al. (1985b) examined heart,<br />

muscle, duodenum, ileum, liver, kidney, brain, and bone<br />

samples and found no differences in tissue P concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> lambs supplemented with and without monensin.<br />

Calcium. There were no effects (P > 0.10) <strong>of</strong> ionophore<br />

supplementation on the apparent absorption or retention <strong>of</strong><br />

Ca (Table 3). There was a tendency (P < 0.10) for lambs supplemented<br />

with lasalocid to have a higher intake <strong>of</strong> Ca when<br />

compared to the control treatment. This was due to an<br />

increased intake <strong>of</strong> hay by the lasalocid-supplemented lambs.<br />

There were no differences (P > 0.10) in concentrations <strong>of</strong> Ca<br />

in heart, liver, kidney, spleen, and muscle (Table 4). Initially<br />

harvested lambs had higher (P < 0.05) concentrations <strong>of</strong><br />

rumen Ca compared to lambs harvested following dietary<br />

treatment. Lasalocid-supplemented lambs had a tendency to<br />

have lower (P < 0.10) rumen concentrations <strong>of</strong> Ca than the<br />

control lambs, but there were no differences (P > 0.10) due to<br />

monensin. Lambs fed monensin had lower (P < 0.05) concentrations<br />

<strong>of</strong> Ca in the bone when compared to control<br />

lambs.<br />

Magnesium. Lambs supplemented with monensin tended<br />

(P < 0.10) to have a lower fecal excretion <strong>of</strong> Mg when<br />

compared to the control animals (Table 3). Yet, monensinsupplemented<br />

lambs also had a greater (P < 0.01) urinary<br />

excretion <strong>of</strong> Mg than the controls. Lambs fed monensin had<br />

greater apparent absorption <strong>of</strong> Mg when expressed as grams<br />

per day (P < 0.10) and expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> intake (P<br />

< 0.05) when compared to lambs fed no ionophore. There<br />

were no differences (P > 0.10) observed in the retention <strong>of</strong><br />

Mg expressed as grams per day and as a percentage <strong>of</strong> intake.<br />

Control lambs, however, had a greater (P < 0.01) retention <strong>of</strong><br />

Mg when expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> absorbed Mg compared<br />

to monensin-supplemented lambs.<br />

Greene et al. (1986) and Kirk et al. (1994) also<br />

observed a decrease in fecal Mg excretion when monensin<br />

was fed to sheep. Greene et al. (1986) also reported that monensin<br />

supplementation increased both the apparent absorption<br />

and retention <strong>of</strong> Mg in concentrate-fed lambs.<br />

There were no differences (P > 0.10) in rumen Mg concentrations<br />

due to treatment observed in this study (Table 4).<br />

Initially harvested lambs had lower liver (P < 0.05) and kidney<br />

(P < 0.10) concentrations <strong>of</strong> Mg than the average <strong>of</strong><br />

lambs fed the three supplements. When compared to control<br />

lambs, monensin increased concentrations <strong>of</strong> Mg in the heart<br />

(P < 0.05), spleen (P < 0.05), and muscle (P < 0.01), but tended<br />

to lower concentrations <strong>of</strong> Mg in bone (P < 0.10).<br />

Implications<br />

Although there were no effects <strong>of</strong> ionophore supplementation<br />

on the retention <strong>of</strong> phosphorus, calcium, or magnesium,<br />

monensin did increase the apparent absorption <strong>of</strong><br />

magnesium. There were significant effects <strong>of</strong> ionophore supplementation<br />

on tissue mineral concentrations suggesting that<br />

ionophores did have a physiological effect on mineral metabolism.<br />

Research should continue to explore the variability <strong>of</strong><br />

ionophore effects on mineral metabolism.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Greene, L. W., et al. 1986. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1960.<br />

Kirk, D. J., et al. 1994. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1029.<br />

Kirk, D. J., et al. 1985a. J. Anim. Sci. 60:1479.<br />

Kirk, D. J., et al. 1985b. J. Anim. Sci. 60:1485.<br />

Spears, J. W., et al. 1989. J. Anim. Sci. 67:2140.<br />

Starnes, S. R., et al. 1984. J. Nutr. 114:518.<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!