15.01.2015 Views

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Arkansas</strong> Animal Science Department Report 2001<br />

(Table 3). Moreover, carcasses <strong>of</strong> Nn pigs had considerably<br />

less (P < 0.01) fat at the tenth rib (0.87 vs. 1.28 in.), and<br />

greater (P < 0.01) LM depth (2.35 vs. 2.00 in.) than carcasses<br />

from NN pigs.<br />

Eikelenboom et al. (1980) reported that carcasses from<br />

Nn pigs had less average backfat than carcasses from NN<br />

pigs. Other studies, however, have shown that carcasses from<br />

NN and Nn pigs had similar midline backfat measurements<br />

and tenth rib fat depths (Leach et al., 1996; Sather and Jones,<br />

1996). Moreover, Simpson and Webb (1989) and Jones et al.<br />

(1988) found that carcasses from Nn pigs were actually fatter<br />

than carcasses from NN pigs.<br />

As for carcass muscling, results from the present study<br />

are comparable to those <strong>of</strong> Sather and Jones (1996) and Jones<br />

et al. (1988), who reported that carcasses from Nn pigs had<br />

greater LM depth and a higher percentage muscle than carcasses<br />

from NN pigs. In contrast, Leach et al. (1996) failed<br />

to denote differences in LM area or depth and carcass muscle<br />

percentage among carcasses from NN and Nn pigs.<br />

Supplementation <strong>of</strong> swine diets with MM had no effect<br />

(P > 0.10) on midline backfat measurements, tenth rib fat<br />

depth, LM depth, or percentage muscle (Table 3). These<br />

results are consistent with those <strong>of</strong> Schaefer et al. (1993) and<br />

D’Souza et al. (1998; 1999), who failed to note an effect <strong>of</strong><br />

supplemental Mg on any fat or muscle measurement <strong>of</strong> pork<br />

carcasses; however, these authors fed Mg aspartate for a brief<br />

5-day period before harvest. In the first experiment, Apple et<br />

al. (2000) reported no effect <strong>of</strong> long-term supplementation <strong>of</strong><br />

MM on pork carcass composition, but, in the second experiment,<br />

they reported a 0.07 to 0.17 in. reduction in tenth rib fat<br />

depth, and a 0.89 to 1.44% increase in percentage muscle <strong>of</strong><br />

carcasses from pigs fed 2.50 and 1.25% MM, respectively.<br />

Although LM pH was not affected (P > 0.81) by<br />

halothane genotype, drip loss percentages were higher (P <<br />

0.01), and LM moisture content was lower (P < 0.01), in pork<br />

from Nn pigs compared to NN pigs (Table 4). The LM from<br />

Nn pigs received lower (P ≤ 0.02) marbling, firmness, and<br />

color scores than the LM from NN pigs. Moreover, pork<br />

from Nn pigs was lighter (P < 0.01), less (P < 0.01) red, and<br />

less (P < 0.01) yellow compared to that from NN pigs, and a<br />

higher proportion <strong>of</strong> carcasses from Nn pigs received<br />

American and Japanese color scores indicating PSE pork<br />

(Table 5).<br />

Our results are in agreement with those <strong>of</strong> Sather and<br />

Jones (1996) and Leach et al. (1996), who found that Nn pigs<br />

produced lighter, less desirable colored pork with greater drip<br />

loss than pork from NN pigs. Moreover, Simpson and Webb<br />

(1989) reported a higher percentage <strong>of</strong> pork carcasses from<br />

Nn pigs were PSE than carcasses from NN pigs, which is<br />

consistent with results from the present study.<br />

The pH <strong>of</strong> the LM was not affected (P > 0.10) by inclusion<br />

<strong>of</strong> MM in the diets <strong>of</strong> growing finishing pigs (Table 4).<br />

Moreover, dietary MM had no effect (P > 0.10) on drip loss<br />

percentages or moisture contents <strong>of</strong> the LM. Results <strong>of</strong> the<br />

present study confirm previously published information from<br />

our laboratory that long-term supplementation <strong>of</strong> swine diets<br />

with MM did not affect LM pH, drip loss, or moisture content.<br />

However, several authors have reported that feeding<br />

diets fortified with Mg shortly before harvest increased initial<br />

and/or ultimate muscle pH (D’Souza et al., 1999; 1998;<br />

Schaefer et al., 1993) and reduced drip loss percentages<br />

(D’Souza et al., 1999; 1998; Schaefer et al., 1993).<br />

Both subjective color scores and objective color measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the LM were similar (P > 0.10) among carcasses<br />

from pigs fed 0.0, 1.25 and 2.50% MM (Table 4). Moreover,<br />

dietary MM had no effect (P > 0.49) on the percentage <strong>of</strong> carcasses<br />

with color scores characteristic <strong>of</strong> PSE pork (Table 5).<br />

Neither O’Quinn et al. (2000) or D’Souza et al. (1999) found<br />

a difference in pork color among pigs fed diets containing<br />

supplemental Mg. On the other hand, D’Souza et al. (1998)<br />

reported lower L* values, and Schaefer et al. (1993) reported<br />

higher a* values, for LM chops from pigs supplemented with<br />

Mg aspartate 5 days before slaughter. Similarly, the percentage<br />

<strong>of</strong> PSE, or PSE-like, carcasses was greatly reduced by<br />

short-term (D’Souza et al., 1998) or long-term (Apple et al.,<br />

2000) Mg supplementation.<br />

Implications<br />

Results from this study indicated that homozygous negative<br />

pigs had greater growth rates and superior pork quality<br />

traits than their heterozygous contemporaries, yet carcasses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the homozygotes were lighter muscled and fatter than the<br />

heterozgyous pigs. Even though inclusion <strong>of</strong> magnesium<br />

mica in the diets <strong>of</strong> growing-finishing pigs had no effect on<br />

pork color or any other pork quality attribute, the economic<br />

benefits realized from enhanced feed efficiency and lower<br />

diet costs (Apple et al., 2000) makes magnesium mica supplementation<br />

an attractive management decision for today’s<br />

swine industry.<br />

Literature Cited<br />

Apple, J. K., et al. 2000. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2135.<br />

D’Souza, D. N., et al. 1998. J. Anim. Sci. 76:104.<br />

D’Souza, D. N., et al. 1999. Meat Sci. 51:221.<br />

Eikelenboom, G., et al. 1980. Livest. Prod. Sci. 7:317.<br />

Jones, S. D. M., et al. 1988. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 68:139.<br />

Leach, L. M., et al. 1996. J. Anim. Sci. 74:934.<br />

Nakai, H., et al. 1975. Bull. Natl. Inst. Anim. Industry (Chiba)<br />

29:69.<br />

NPPC. 1999. Official Color and Marbling Standards.<br />

National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA.<br />

NPPC. 1991. Procedures to Evaluate Market Hogs (3rd<br />

Edition). National Pork Producers Council, Des<br />

Moines, IA.<br />

NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements <strong>of</strong> Swine (10th Edition).<br />

National Academy Press, Washington, DC.<br />

O’Quinn, P. R., et al. 2000. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80:443.<br />

Sather, A. P., and S. D. M. Jones. 1996. Can. J. Anim. Sci.<br />

76:507.<br />

Schaefer, A. L., et al. 1993. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 73:231.<br />

Simpson, S. P., and A. J. Webb, A. J. 1989. Anim. Prod.<br />

49:503.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!