15.01.2015 Views

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Genetic Parameter Estimates <strong>of</strong> Yearling Live Animal<br />

Ultrasonic Measurements in Brangus Cattle<br />

A. M. Stelzleni, 1 T. L. Perkins, 2 A. H. Brown, Jr., 1 F. W. Pohlman, 1 Z. B. Johnson, 1 and B. A. Sandelin 1<br />

Story in Brief<br />

The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to estimate genetic parameters for real-time ultrasound measurements <strong>of</strong> longissimus<br />

muscle area (LMAU), 12th-rib back fat thickness (FTU), percent intra-muscular fat (PFAT), and yearling weight<br />

(YW) for 1,299 yearling Brangus bulls and heifers. A single ultrasound technician took all measurements. Number <strong>of</strong><br />

observations was 1,298, 1,298, 1,215, and 1,170 for LMAU, FTU, PFAT, and YW, respectively. Genetic parameters<br />

were estimated for each trait using single- and multiple-trait DFREML procedures (MTDFREML). Each trait was analyzed<br />

as a single-trait, then in combination with each other trait in a series <strong>of</strong> two-trait models. Means for LMAU, FTU,<br />

PFAT, and YW were 11.13 ± 2.25 in 2 , 0.22 ± 0.10 in, 3.27 ± 0.92 %, and 1030.51 ± 188.23 lb, respectively. Heritabilities<br />

obtained from single-trait analysis <strong>of</strong> LMAU, FTU, PFAT and YW were 0.31, 0.26, 0.16, and 0.53, respectively. Average<br />

heritabilities from the two-trait analyses for LMAU, FTU, PFAT, and YW were 0.31, 0.27, 0.15, and 0.53, respectively.<br />

Genetic correlations for LMAU and FTU, LMAU and PFAT, LMAU and YW, FTU and PFAT, FTU and YW, and PFAT<br />

and YW were -0.09, -0.25, 0.44, 0.36, 0.42, and 0.31, respectively. These data suggest a substantial additive genetic<br />

effect for YW, FTU, and LMAU implying a strong relationship between phenotypic value and breeding value for these<br />

traits.<br />

Introduction<br />

Collection <strong>of</strong> ultrasound measurements is faster, easier,<br />

and more economical than traditional methods <strong>of</strong> collecting<br />

carcass data that include harvesting <strong>of</strong> animals. Green (1996)<br />

stated the amount <strong>of</strong> useful carcass data that can be easily and<br />

economically collected is unlimited. Some beef cattle breed<br />

associations collect yearling live-animal ultrasound measurements<br />

<strong>of</strong> carcass traits for purebred bulls and heifers. These<br />

measurements are to be used in collaboration with genetic<br />

performance records already used by seedstock and commercial<br />

cattle breeders. Research and literature reporting on<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> genetic parameters for carcass trait measurements<br />

taken by live-animal ultrasound techniques is plentiful.<br />

Before these data can be effectively utilized, each association<br />

must state proven heritabilities and correlations for their<br />

respective breeds for ultrasound measurements <strong>of</strong> these carcass<br />

traits. The objective <strong>of</strong> this research was to obtain accurate<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> heritabilities and genetic correlations for<br />

carcass traits <strong>of</strong> yearling bulls and heifers in the Brangus<br />

breed.<br />

Experimental Procedures<br />

Animals and Data Collection. Purebred Brangus cattle<br />

(n = 1,299) had real-time ultrasound (RTU) measurements<br />

taken for inclusion in this study. Of these animals 226 were<br />

heifers and 1,073 were yearling bulls. All animals were<br />

scanned by a single ultrasound technician, and were taken in<br />

accordance to the Beef Improvement Federation guidelines<br />

(BIF, 1996). At the time <strong>of</strong> ultrasounding, measurements<br />

were taken <strong>of</strong> the 12th-rib longissimus muscle area (LMAU),<br />

12th-rib fat thickness (FTU), percent intra-muscular fat<br />

(PFAT), and yearling weight (YW). Other data collected<br />

included location <strong>of</strong> ranch, sex <strong>of</strong> animal, age <strong>of</strong> animal, and<br />

animal registration number in accordance with the<br />

International Brangus Breeders Association (IBBA; San<br />

Antonio, TX). All animals included in the study had pedigrees<br />

traced back to paternal and maternal grandparents.<br />

The equipment used in the collection <strong>of</strong> data was the<br />

Aloka 500V system (distributed by Aloka USA, Inc.,<br />

Wallingford, CT) along with a superflab to ensure proper fit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the transducer to the curvature <strong>of</strong> the animal's natural body<br />

shape. The s<strong>of</strong>tware used was the Critical Vision (CVIS) s<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

(Critical Vision, Inc., Atlanta, GA). Placement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transducer was determined by palpating the left side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

animal between the 12th and 13th ribs. Once the scanning<br />

area was determined, the location was oiled, curried free <strong>of</strong><br />

dirt and debris, and oiled again before transducer placement.<br />

The transducer was placed toward the midline and parallel to<br />

the 12th and 13th rib bones and moved laterally until the<br />

longissimus muscle came into full view on the screen. Fat<br />

thickness was estimated at the 3/4 position from the chine<br />

bone end <strong>of</strong> the longissimus muscle (U.S.D.A. beef carcass<br />

grade standards) using the cross sectional ribeye image. A<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Science, Fayetteville<br />

2 Southwest Missouri State <strong>University</strong>, Springfield<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!