Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Impact <strong>of</strong> Multiple Antimicrobial Intervention Agents on<br />
Ground Beef Sensory Properties<br />
F. W. Pohlman, 1 M. R. Stivarius, 2 K. S. McElyea, 1 Z. B. Johnson, 1<br />
and M.G. Johnson 3<br />
Story in Brief<br />
The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> multiple antimicrobial interventions on ground beef sensory characteristics through display<br />
was studied. Beef trimmings were inoculated with Escherichia coli (EC) and Salmonella typhimurium (ST), then treated<br />
with either 1) 5% acetic acid followed by 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride (AC), 2) 200 ppm chlorine dioxide followed<br />
by 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride (CC), 3) 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride followed by 10% trisodium phosphate (CT);<br />
or 4) control (C). Trimmings were ground, packaged and sampled through display for sensory color and odor characteristics.<br />
The CT treatment had less (P < 0.05) overall, worst point and percentage discoloration than C by day 7 <strong>of</strong> display.<br />
Ground beef from the CC treated trimmings was similar (P > 0.05) in worst point color and percentage discoloration<br />
to C through 3 days <strong>of</strong> display. Although minor differences existed initially, sensory panelists were unable to<br />
detect (P > 0.05) beef odor or <strong>of</strong>f odor differences between C, CC and CT treatments throughout display. Therefore,<br />
treatment <strong>of</strong> beef trimmings with CC or CT before grinding did not impact sensory evaluated color or aroma <strong>of</strong> ground<br />
beef during simulated retail display.<br />
Introduction<br />
In the wake <strong>of</strong> ground beef recalls, the safety <strong>of</strong> this<br />
product remains <strong>of</strong> vital concern; therefore, considerable<br />
research continues to be conducted for improving the safety<br />
<strong>of</strong> meat products. It has been reviewed, that the use <strong>of</strong> single<br />
decontamination interventions are effective for reducing<br />
pathogens on carcass (Dickson and Anderson 1992; Siragusa,<br />
1995). However, contamination resulting from carcass fabrication<br />
can be carried through grinding operations, ultimately<br />
contaminating the ground beef product. Therefore, it would<br />
be advantageous to develop meat decontamination procedures<br />
immediately prior to, or during, ground beef production.<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> single intervention techniques during ground<br />
beef manufacture has been relatively effective for reducing<br />
microorganisms compared to carcass decontamination (Gill<br />
and Bandoni, 1997; Dorsa et al., 1998). However, the use <strong>of</strong><br />
multiple antimicrobial treatments to decontaminate meat<br />
before grinding might provide a greater barrier to microbial<br />
survival in ground beef by taking advantage <strong>of</strong> different<br />
weaknesses <strong>of</strong> differing microbial strains.<br />
In addition to antimicrobial effectiveness another concern<br />
is the impact <strong>of</strong> these treatments on meat color and odor.<br />
Therefore, the objective <strong>of</strong> this research was to determine the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> an organic acid and other novel decontamination<br />
compounds, used in combination, on sensory characteristics<br />
<strong>of</strong> ground beef.<br />
Experimental Procedures<br />
Bacterial preparation and inoculation. Inoculums were<br />
prepared from frozen (-80oC) stock cultures <strong>of</strong> Escherichia<br />
coli (ATCC #11775; EC) and a nalidixic acid resistant strain<br />
<strong>of</strong> Salmonella typhimurium (ATTC 1769NR; ST). E. coli was<br />
maintained by brain heart infusion (BHI; Difco Laboratories,<br />
Detroit, MI) broth with glycerol (20%), and Salmonella<br />
typhimurium was maintained by BHI broth containing<br />
nalidixic acid (Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ) with glycerol<br />
(20%). Frozen cultures <strong>of</strong> E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium<br />
were thawed, and 0.1 ml <strong>of</strong> E. coli suspension was inoculated<br />
into separate 40 ml aliquots <strong>of</strong> BHI, and 0.1 ml <strong>of</strong><br />
Salmonella typhimurium suspension was inoculated into separate<br />
40 ml aliquots <strong>of</strong> BHI with nalidixic acid. After 18<br />
hours <strong>of</strong> incubation at 98.6°F, bacteria were harvested by centrifugation<br />
(3649 x g for 20 min @ 98.6°F; Beckman GS-6<br />
series, Fullerton, CA), re-suspended in the same volume <strong>of</strong><br />
0.1% buffered peptone water (BPW; Difco Laboratories,<br />
Detroit, MI) and then pooled together (1600 ml <strong>of</strong> E. coli and<br />
1600 ml <strong>of</strong> Salmonella typhimurium) to make a bacterial<br />
cocktail. The cocktail (3200 ml; log 10 7 colony forming units<br />
[CFU]/ml E. coli and log 10 7 CFU/ml Salmonella typhimurium)<br />
was cooled to 39.2°F and combined with boneless beef<br />
trimmings (28.2 lb) and allowed to attach for 1 hour. The<br />
meat was then drained, separated into 7.8 lb batches, and<br />
placed in a 39.2°F cooler for 12 to 14 hours to allow further<br />
microbial attachment.<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Science, Fayetteville.<br />
2 Griffith Laboratories, Griffith Center, Alsip, IL 60658<br />
3 Department <strong>of</strong> Food Science, Fayetteville.<br />
160