Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Use <strong>of</strong> Hurdle Technology to Reduce Microorganisms in Ground Beef<br />
F. W. Pohlman, 1 M. R. Stivarius, 2 K. S. McElyea, 1 Z. B. Johnson, 1<br />
and M. G. Johnson 3<br />
Story in Brief<br />
The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> multiple antimicrobial interventions (hurdle technology) on ground beef microbial characteristics<br />
through simulated retail display was studied. Beef trimmings were inoculated with Escherichia coli (EC) and<br />
Salmonella typhimurium (ST) then treated with either 1) 5% acetic acid followed by 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride<br />
(AC), 2) 200 ppm chlorine dioxide followed by 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride (CC), 3) 0.5% cetylpyridinium chloride<br />
followed by 10% trisodium phosphate (CT) or 4) control (C). Trimmings were ground, packaged and sampled on days<br />
0, 1, 2, 3 and 7 <strong>of</strong> display for EC, ST, coliforms (CO) and aerobic plate count (APC). All treatments reduced (P < 0.05)<br />
all bacterial types monitored. In addition, ST was reduced (P < 0.05) through 7 days <strong>of</strong> display and APC was held in<br />
check as display progressed. Therefore, the use <strong>of</strong> hurdle technology was effective for reducing microbial pathogens in<br />
ground beef and would subsequently improve the safety <strong>of</strong> this product.<br />
Introduction<br />
The meat industry continues to face concerns regarding<br />
the safety <strong>of</strong> its products. It has been reviewed that the use <strong>of</strong><br />
single decontamination interventions are effective for reducing<br />
pathogens on carcass surfaces (Dickson and Anderson<br />
1992; Siragusa, 1995). However, since most carcass decontamination<br />
treatments do not sterilize the carcass, microorganisms<br />
remaining on carcass surfaces can easily become inoculated<br />
onto freshly cut surfaces during carcass fabrication, and<br />
subsequently carried through grinding operations.<br />
Multiple intervention technology utilizes different barriers<br />
or hurdles such as pH changes, oxidizing environments,<br />
or other environmental changes to cause disruption <strong>of</strong> microbial<br />
cells or cellular metabolism, to either destroy bacterial<br />
cells or retard their growth. Hurdle technology has been more<br />
effective than single interventions for beef carcass decontamination<br />
(Phebus et al., 1997; Graves-Delmore et al., 1998). In<br />
addition, Ellebracht et al. (1999) used 203°F hot water and<br />
2% lactic acid multiple interventions in the production <strong>of</strong><br />
ground beef to reduce E. coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and<br />
aerobic plate counts 1.1, 1.8, and 1.5 log colony forming units<br />
(CFU)/g, respectively. Therefore, the objective <strong>of</strong> this<br />
research was to determine the effects <strong>of</strong> an organic acid and<br />
other novel decontamination compounds, used in combination,<br />
on the microbial stability <strong>of</strong> ground beef.<br />
Experimental Procedures<br />
Bacterial preparation and inoculation. Inoculums were<br />
prepared from frozen (-112°F) stock cultures <strong>of</strong> Escherichia<br />
coli (ATCC #11775; EC) and a nalidixic acid resistant strain<br />
<strong>of</strong> Salmonella typhimurium (ATTC 1769NR; ST). E. coli was<br />
maintained by brain heart infusion (BHI)(Difco Laboratories,<br />
Detroit, MI) broth with glycerol (20%) and Salmonella<br />
typhimurium was maintained by BHI broth containing<br />
nalidixic acid (Fisher Scientific, Fairlawn, NJ) with glycerol<br />
(20%). Frozen cultures <strong>of</strong> E. coli and Salmonella typhimurium<br />
were thawed, and 0.1 ml <strong>of</strong> E. coli suspension was inoculated<br />
into separate 40 ml aliquots <strong>of</strong> BHI, and 0.1 ml <strong>of</strong><br />
Salmonella typhimurium suspension was inoculated into separate<br />
40 ml aliquots <strong>of</strong> BHI with nalidixic acid. After 18<br />
hours <strong>of</strong> incubation at 98.6°F, bacteria were harvested by centrifugation<br />
(3649 x g for 20 min @ 98.6°F)(Beckman GS-6<br />
series, Fullerton, CA), re-suspended in the same volume <strong>of</strong><br />
0.1% buffered peptone water (BPW) (Difco Laboratories,<br />
Detroit, MI and then pooled together (1600 ml <strong>of</strong> E. coli and<br />
1600 ml <strong>of</strong> Salmonella typhimurium) to make a bacterial<br />
cocktail. The cocktail (3200 ml; log 10 7 colony forming units<br />
(CFU)/ml E. coli and log 107 CFU/ml Salmonella typhimurium)<br />
was cooled to 39.2°F and combined with boneless beef<br />
trimmings (28.2 lb) and allowed to attach for 1 hour. The<br />
meat was then drained and separated into 7.9 lb batches and<br />
placed in a 39.2°F cooler for 12 to14 hours to allow further<br />
microbial attachment.<br />
1 Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Science, Fayetteville.<br />
2 Griffith Laboratories, Griffith Center, Alsip, IL 60658.<br />
3 Department <strong>of</strong> Food Science, Fayetteville.<br />
168