15.01.2015 Views

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Breed-Type x Forage Interaction for Mature Weight and Rate <strong>of</strong> Maturing<br />

for Angus, Brahman, and Reciprocal Cross Cows<br />

B. A. Sandelin, 1 A. H. Brown, Jr., 1 M. A. Brown, 2 Z. B. Johnson, 1 and A. M. Stelzleni 1<br />

Story in Brief<br />

Mature weight (A) and rate <strong>of</strong> maturing (k) were estimated in 177 Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal cross cows<br />

grazing Bermudagrass (BG) or endophyte-infected tall fescue (E+) to evaluate breed-type x forage interactions. Data<br />

were collected every 28 d until approximately 18 mo <strong>of</strong> age and then at prebreeding, postcalving, and weaning <strong>of</strong> calf.<br />

Mature weight and k were estimated using Brody’s model. Data were pooled over year and analyzed by the general linear<br />

model (GLM) procedure <strong>of</strong> SAS. Models for A and k included the independent variables <strong>of</strong> breed-type, forage and<br />

breed-type x forage interaction. There was a significant (P < 0.01) breed-type x forage interaction for A, but not for k.<br />

Angus cows had greater (P < 0.01) mean A on E+ than did Angus x Brahman cows on BG. Angus x Brahman cows grazing<br />

BG had lower (P < 0.05) mean A than did Brahman x Angus cows grazing BG or E+ and Brahman cows grazing<br />

BG. Angus cows had a slower (P < 0.05) mean k than Angus x Brahman and Brahman x Angus cows, and Angus x<br />

Brahman cows had a faster (P < 0.05) mean k than Brahman x Angus and Brahman cows. These data suggest that the<br />

choice <strong>of</strong> breed-type is important for maintaining a crossbreeding program, in that mature size and rate <strong>of</strong> maturing are<br />

critical to the match <strong>of</strong> animal requirements to available production resources.<br />

Introduction<br />

The growth parameters <strong>of</strong> mature weight (A) and rate <strong>of</strong><br />

maturing (k) have been shown to be <strong>of</strong> biological importance<br />

to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> beef production. These parameters are<br />

major determinants <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong> energy needed to grow<br />

and mature properly. The availability <strong>of</strong> adequate production<br />

resources <strong>of</strong>ten hinders the level <strong>of</strong> efficiency needed to sustain<br />

this level <strong>of</strong> energy. These parameters may be useful to<br />

producers who are trying to find the ideal animal to match<br />

available resources. There have been numerous papers that<br />

deal with the calculation <strong>of</strong> A and k in many breeds <strong>of</strong> cattle,<br />

however, a review <strong>of</strong> literature found a limited amount <strong>of</strong><br />

growth curve data for crossbred cattle. Problems associated<br />

with endophyte-infected tall fescue (E+) have been extensively<br />

documented. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to look at<br />

the interaction <strong>of</strong> breed-type x forage for the growth parameters<br />

<strong>of</strong> A and k in Angus, Brahman, and reciprocal cross cows<br />

grazing common bermudagrass or endophyte-infected tall<br />

fescue.<br />

Experimental Procedures<br />

Base Herd Development. Eighty purebred Angus and<br />

80 purebred Brahman heifers born in the spring <strong>of</strong> 1985 were<br />

purchased from approximately 20 different sources per breed<br />

in the fall <strong>of</strong> 1985 and winter <strong>of</strong> 1986. Of these heifers, 32<br />

and 30 different sires were represented in Angus and<br />

Brahman breeds, respectively. Heifers were stratified according<br />

to source and assigned at random to one <strong>of</strong> four 36-acre<br />

BG pastures and one <strong>of</strong> four 36-acre ‘Kentucky-31’ E+<br />

pastures.<br />

Stocking rate for each pasture within forage environment<br />

ranged from 19 to 24 head, with approximately equal<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> Angus and Brahman. Heifers were managed as<br />

commercial replacement heifers to gain approximately 0.80<br />

lb/d by supplementing with cottonseed meal, corn, and E+ or<br />

BG hay according to visual estimates <strong>of</strong> forage DM availability<br />

and normal quality curves for either BG or E+.<br />

Normally, supplemental feed was provided from late<br />

November to late April for both forage treatment types; supplemental<br />

grain (2.0 lb per animal per day) was continued in<br />

the E+ treatment into late fall and early spring in an attempt<br />

to moderate potential toxicity from the forage. Minerals were<br />

fed free choice throughout the year.<br />

Heifers were bred as 2-yr-olds to calve at 3 yr <strong>of</strong> age to<br />

preclude introducing parity differences into the study due to<br />

the low percentage <strong>of</strong> purebred Brahman reaching sexual<br />

maturity at 15 mo <strong>of</strong> age. They were bred during 75 d breeding<br />

seasons. Five sires <strong>of</strong> each breed were used in this study.<br />

Sires were rotated among breeding pastures in both forage<br />

treatments to prevent confounding <strong>of</strong> sire and forage effects,<br />

and breed <strong>of</strong> sire was alternated in a breeding pasture to facilitate<br />

sire <strong>of</strong> calf identification.<br />

Study Animals. Calves were born from late February to<br />

late May each year. Weights were taken, and calves were<br />

tagged at birth. The post-weaning backgrounding environments<br />

were designed to imitate two commercial situations: 1)<br />

a warm season, dormant forage environment (BG) and 2) a<br />

cool-season forage environment (E+) where growing forage<br />

is available for a portion <strong>of</strong> the evaluation period and supple-<br />

1 Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Science, Fayetteville<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Grazinglands Research Laboratory, El Reno, OK<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!