Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Arkansas Animal Science Department Report 2001 Table 2. Mean flavor scores 1 for treatment by gender by age category. Age category Gender Treatment 2 Under 30 3 Over 30 4 Female GC 5.62 + .44 ab 5.38 + .45 GS 5.90 + .44 a 4.38 + .45 FC 4.60 + .44 b 5.83 + .52 FS 5.62 + .26 a 4.78 + .26 Male GC 5.32 + .36 ab 5.27 + .38 GS 5.28 + .36 ab 5.73 + .38 FC 5.46 + .37 ab 5.10 + .40 FS 4.83 + .21 b 5.16 + .23 1 Flavor scores range from 1 to 8 with 1 = extreme milky oily and 8 = extreme beef fat. 2 Treatment codes: GC = corn fed beef that graded Choice; GS = corn fed beef that graded Select; FC = wheat fed beef that graded Choice; FS = wheat fed beef that graded Select. 3 Treatment x gender interaction (P < 0.05). 4 No difference due to treatment or gender in the over 30 category. a,b Means in a column with no common letters differ (P < 0.05). Table 3. Treatment by age category means for juiciness, tenderness and acceptability scores of beef steaks. Characteristic of steak 1 Age category Treatment 2 Juiciness 3 Tenderness 3 Acceptability 3 Under 30 GC 5.23 + .36 a 5.92 + .35 a 6.12 + .23 ab GS 5.19 + .36 a 5.52 + .35 abc 5.74 + .23 abc FC 4.34 + .37 bc 4.83 + .36 c 4.58 + .24 e FS 4.18 + .24 c 5.16 + .21 bc 4.93 + .14 de Over 30 GC 5.22 + .44 ab 6.30 + .43 a 6.29 + .31 a GS 5.14 + .44 a 5.30 + .43 abc 5.40 + .31 bc FC 3.12 + .47 d 3.78 + .46 d 3.69 + .34 f FS 4.64 + .26 ab 5.60 + .26 ab 5.20 + .19 cd 1 Scores range from 1 to 8 with 1 = extremely dry to 8 = extremely juicy for juiciness; 1 = extremely tough to 8 = extremely tender for tenderness; and 1 = extremely undesirable to 8 = extremely desirable for overall acceptability. 2 Treatment codes: GC = corn fed beef that graded Choice; GS = corn fed beef that graded Select; FC = wheat fed beef that graded Choice; FS = wheat fed beef that graded Select. 3 Treatment by age category interaction (P < 0.05). a,b,c,d,e,f Means in a column with no letters in common differ (P < 0.05). Table 4. Treatment by gender means for juiciness, tenderness and acceptability scores of beef steaks. Characteristic of steak 1 Gender Treatment 2 Juiciness 3 Tenderness 4 Acceptability 4 Female GC 5.10 + .42 ab 6.32 + .42 a 5.92 + .30 ab GS 4.92 + .42 ab 4.97 + .42 b 5.19 + .30 bc FC 3.17 + .44 d 3.76 + .44 c 3.39 + .32 d FS 4.60 + .25 bc 5.65 + .25 a 5.14 + .18 bc Male GC 5.36 + .37 a 5.89 + .36 a 6.49 + .24 a GS 5.41 + .37 a 5.85 + .36 a 5.95 + .24 a FC 4.30 + .38 bc 4.85 + .37 b 4.89 + .25 c FS 4.22 + .22 c 5.10 + .21 b 4.99 + .14 c 1 Scores range from 1 to 8 with 1 = extremely dry to 8 = extremely juicy for juiciness; 1 = extremely tough to 8 = extremely tender for tenderness; and 1 = extremely undesirable to 8 = extremely desirable for overall acceptability. 2 Treatment codes: GC = corn fed beef that graded choice; GS = corn fed beef that graded select; FC = wheat fed beef that graded choice; FS = wheat fed beef that graded select. 3 Treatment by gender interaction (P < 0.05). 4 Treatment by gender interaction (P < 0.01). a,b,c,d Means in a column with no letters in common differ (P < 0.05). 174
AAES Research Series 488 Table 5. Sex by age category means for juiciness, tenderness, and acceptability scores of beef steaks. Characteristic of steak 1 Age category Sex Juiciness 2 Tenderness 2 Acceptability 3 Under 30 Female 4.29 + .25 5.03 + .25 5.23 + .17 b Male 4.84 + .21 5.42 + .21 5.45 + .13 b Over 30 Female 4.64 + .19 5.30 + .19 4.58 + .22 a Male 4.82 + .14 5.42 + .14 5.71 + .18 b 1 Scores range from 1 to 8 with 1 = extremely dry to 8 = extremely juicy for juiciness; 1 = extremely tough to 8 = extremely tender for tenderness; and 1 = extremely undesirable to 8 = extremely desirable for overall acceptability. 2 No differences (P > 0.05) due to age category or gender. 3 Age category by gender interaction (P < 0.01). a,b Means in a column with no letters in common differ (P < 0.05). 175
Page 1 and 2:
Arkansas Animal Science Department
Page 3:
spine copy ARKANSAS ANIMAL SCIENCE
Page 6 and 7:
INTRODUCTION The faculty and staff
Page 8 and 9:
COMMON ABBREVIATIONS Abbreviation T
Page 10 and 11:
The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizati
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Demographics and Academic Success o
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Efficacy of Mannan Oligosaccharide
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Effects of Dietary Magnesium and Ha
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Effect of Feather Meal on Live Anim
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Maternal Effects for Performance Te
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Supplementation of Beef Cows and He
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Influence of Supplementing Cobalt i
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Long-Term Immune Response of Beef H
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Small Grain Forage for Stocker Catt
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Economics of Production Systems Inv
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Influence of Moisture Concentration
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Impact of Spontaneous Heating Durin
Page 128 and 129: Arkansas Animal Science Department
Page 134 and 135: Effects of Tall Fescue Inoculated w
Page 142 and 143: Yield and Nutritive Value of Easter
Page 154 and 155: 2000 Dairy Herd Improvement Herds i
Page 164 and 165: The Impact of Multiple Antimicrobia
Page 168 and 169: The Impact of Multiple Antimicrobia
Page 172 and 173: The Use of Hurdle Technology to Red
Page 176 and 177: Consumer Acceptability of Forage Fe
Page 180: Arkansas Animal Science Department
show all

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?