15.01.2015 Views

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Supplementation <strong>of</strong> Beef Cows and Heifers Consuming<br />

High Quality Fescue Hay<br />

D. L. Kreider, R. W. Rorie, N. Post, and K. Cole 1<br />

Story in Brief<br />

Seventy-six spring calving, cross-bred cows and heifers <strong>of</strong> mostly Angus breeding were used to determine the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> pre- and post-partum supplementation on post-partum reproductive performance when consuming harvested<br />

high-quality cool-season forages. Forage used in the study was tall fescue hay having 16.05% CP and 58.4% TDN.<br />

Cows and heifers received either no supplement (Control), 2 lb <strong>of</strong> Corn (Corn) or 2 lb <strong>of</strong> a 17% CP corn-soybean meal<br />

supplement (Corn-Soy). Cows and heifers were placed on supplement before calving and continued on the same supplement<br />

into the post-partum period. Control (non-supplemented) heifers had greater weight loss in the post-partum<br />

period (P < 0.01), lower weaning weights (P < 0.10) and ADG (P < 0.08) by nursing calves than Corn or Corn-Soy supplemented<br />

heifers. Cows receiving the Corn-Soy supplement had a shorter calving interval (P = 0.10) than Control cows.<br />

Reproductive performance was poor in all treatment groups, suggesting that intake <strong>of</strong> forage in all groups was not adequate<br />

to meet nutritional requirements.<br />

Introduction<br />

Feed costs constitute 60 to 70% <strong>of</strong> the annual cost <strong>of</strong><br />

maintaining a beef cow and a large part <strong>of</strong> feed cost is represented<br />

by the cost <strong>of</strong> supplements. Recent data (Davis, 2000)<br />

indicate that 89% <strong>of</strong> the hay samples assayed in <strong>Arkansas</strong><br />

were adequate in protein for a dry gestating cow and 59% <strong>of</strong><br />

samples had adequate protein for lactating cows. In the same<br />

study, TDN was adequate for dry gestating cows in 75% <strong>of</strong><br />

the hay tested, while only 28% <strong>of</strong> the samples had adequate<br />

TDN for lactating cows. These data suggest that dry gestating<br />

cows and, in some instances, lactating cows can be maintained<br />

on forage alone or on an energy supplement alone<br />

since protein is adequate in many cases. It is well established<br />

that adequate nutrition <strong>of</strong> the cow in the pre- and post-partum<br />

period is a critical factor in achieving successful post-partum<br />

reproduction (Richards et al., 1986; Selk et al., 1988). It has<br />

also been demonstrated that excessively high dietary protein<br />

intake has been associated with decreased fertility (Jordan<br />

and Swanson 1979; Kaim et al., 1983; Canfield et al. 1990).<br />

Since protein supplements are relatively high in cost compared<br />

to energy supplements and excess protein can have<br />

detrimental effects on reproductive performance, minimizing<br />

the supplemental protein fed may be beneficial to producers.<br />

The following study was conducted to compare the effects <strong>of</strong><br />

no supplement, an energy supplement and a 17% CP supplement<br />

on the post-partum reproductive performance <strong>of</strong> beef<br />

cows consuming high quality tall fescue hay.<br />

Experimental Procedures<br />

Seventy-six spring calving, cross-bred cows and heifers<br />

with mostly Angus breeding were used to determine the<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> pre- and post-partum supplementation on post-partum<br />

reproductive performance <strong>of</strong> cows consuming harvested<br />

high-quality cool-season hay (Table 1). Before calving, animals<br />

were blocked by body weight, parity and body condition<br />

score (BCS) and randomly assigned to one <strong>of</strong> three treatment<br />

groups. Animals received either no supplement (Control), 2<br />

lb <strong>of</strong> corn per animal per day (Corn), or 2 lb per animal per<br />

day <strong>of</strong> a 17% CP corn-soybean meal supplement (Corn-Soy).<br />

Supplementation was started at approximately 7 to 8 weeks<br />

pre-partum and animals remained on the same supplements<br />

until the start <strong>of</strong> the breeding season. Cows were maintained<br />

as a single group, and were sorted from calves once daily<br />

(Monday-Saturday) and fed supplement individually.<br />

Treatment groups remained together in the same pen or pasture<br />

at all times except at daily supplementation. Supplements<br />

were fed to all groups until the start <strong>of</strong> the breeding season.<br />

Ad libitum access to the mixed fescue hay, mineral supplement,<br />

and water was available at all times.<br />

In order to evaluate the effects <strong>of</strong> supplements on body<br />

weight change and energy reserves, body weights and BCS<br />

were taken at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the trial and at the start <strong>of</strong> the<br />

60-day breeding season. In order to access reproductive status<br />

via serum progesterone concentration, all animals were<br />

bled weekly beginning at 3 weeks post-partum and continuing<br />

until the start <strong>of</strong> the breeding season. Blood samples, collected<br />

by jugular venipuncture, were stored on ice and<br />

1 All authors are associated with the Department <strong>of</strong> Animal Science, Fayetteville.<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!