Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
Arkansas - Agricultural Communication Services - University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Arkansas</strong> Animal Science Department Report 2001<br />
Table 4. Estimated genetic parameters for ADG, average daily feed<br />
intake (ADFI), loin eye area (LEA), and backfat using appropriate<br />
two-trait models a that included weight at 100 d <strong>of</strong> age (WT100)<br />
for each breed.<br />
Breed<br />
Item b Landrace Yorkshire Duroc Hampshire<br />
ADG<br />
h 2 a 0.28 0.26 0.14 0.17<br />
h 2 m 0.02 0.02 0.03 0<br />
r am -0.62 -0.33 0 0<br />
c 2 0.14 0.17 0.15 0.18<br />
ADFI<br />
h 2 a 0.34 0.31 0.20 0.23<br />
h 2 m 0.05 0 0 0<br />
r am -0.73 0 0 0<br />
c 2 0.22 0.20 0.24 0.24<br />
LEA<br />
h 2 a 0.48 0.39 0.26 0.25<br />
h 2 m 0.06 0.04 0 0<br />
r am -0.67 -0.67 0 0<br />
c 2 0.09 0.14 0.12 0.18<br />
Backfat<br />
h 2 a 0.63 0.65 0.35 0.31<br />
h 2 m 0.07 0.06 0 0<br />
r am -0.66 -0.69 0 0<br />
c 2 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.10<br />
a Models for each trait included effects that were found to be important (Table 2). When maternal genetic effects or the correlation<br />
between additive direct and maternal genetic effects were found to be unimportant, these effects are reported as 0.<br />
b Notation: heritability for additive direct effects (h 2 a); heritability for maternal genetic effects; (h 2 m); correlation between direct<br />
and maternal effects (r am ); proportion <strong>of</strong> common litter environmental effects (c 2 ).<br />
44