18.01.2015 Views

2007 Benchmarking Report - Alliance for Biking & Walking

2007 Benchmarking Report - Alliance for Biking & Walking

2007 Benchmarking Report - Alliance for Biking & Walking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Denver, CO receives Bicycle-Friendly-Community award<br />

PHOTO COURTESY OF THE LEAGUE OF AMERICAN BICYCLISTS<br />

NCBW identified four benchmarks: presence of statewide longrange<br />

plan <strong>for</strong> bike/pedestrian elements, accommodating bikes<br />

into all transport projects, accommodating pedestrians into all<br />

state highway projects, and other special programs.<br />

NCBW assessed whether each state met national standards<br />

<strong>for</strong> these Benchmarks. Results were reported as “Yes” or<br />

“No” <strong>for</strong> each state meeting all or part of the benchmark, and<br />

summarized by each benchmark. They concluded that most<br />

state DOTs did not meet the benchmarks they identified <strong>for</strong><br />

bicycle and pedestrian planning, accommodation (design), and<br />

special programs. All four of the benchmarks they identified are<br />

addressed in some way in Chapter 5 of this report. Although<br />

Thunderhead’s surveys did not frame questions in the same<br />

way, its review and discussion of complete streets policies, Safe<br />

Routes to School, and other bicycle and pedestrian policies addresses<br />

many of the same issues covered in NCBW’s report.<br />

Evaluating Walkability & Bikeability of Communities<br />

The Pedestrian and Bicycle In<strong>for</strong>mation Center’s Walkability<br />

and Bikeability checklists are another means of evaluating<br />

conditions <strong>for</strong> bicycling and walking. These checklists are<br />

community tools that allow individuals to subjectively score their<br />

communities. The document invites individuals to go <strong>for</strong> a walk<br />

or bike ride with survey in hand and to rate their experience on<br />

a scale of one to five while checking off potential problems. The<br />

document then goes through each question and offers potential<br />

solutions to common problems and also provides a list of resources<br />

at the end. This survey could be useful <strong>for</strong> community<br />

stakeholders wishing to gain insight into “bikeability” or “walkability.”<br />

It could also be used by advocates in coordinated education<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts or to raise public perception of a problem area.<br />

National Bicycle & Pedestrian Documentation Project<br />

While not a benchmarking project per se, the National<br />

Bicycle and Pedestrian Documentation Project is addressing a<br />

critical component of all benchmarking ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> bicycling and<br />

walking: trip counts. A more accurate and standardized way of<br />

measuring biking and walking trips would result in far more accurate<br />

benchmarking results. The National Bicycle and Pedestrian<br />

Documentation Project, coordinated by the Institute of Transportation<br />

Engineers, sets detailed standards and guidelines and<br />

provides tools <strong>for</strong> per<strong>for</strong>ming bicycle and pedestrian counts and<br />

surveys in communities. The objectives of the project are to:<br />

“ (1) Establish a consistent national bicycle and pedestrian<br />

count and survey methodology, building on the ‘best practices’ from<br />

around the country, and publicize the availability of this free material<br />

<strong>for</strong> use by agencies and organizations on-line.<br />

(2) Establish a national database of bicycle and pedestrian<br />

count in<strong>for</strong>mation generated by these consistent methods and practices.<br />

(3) Use the count and survey in<strong>for</strong>mation to begin analysis on<br />

the correlations between various factors and bicycle and pedestrian activity.<br />

These factors may range from land use to demographics to type<br />

of new facility.”<br />

As of the publication date of this report, 30 cities have<br />

conducted counts using these methodologies <strong>for</strong> pedestrians, cyclists<br />

and multi-use trails, with most counts to date having been<br />

<strong>for</strong> multi-use trails..<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

13<br />

Bicycling & <strong>Walking</strong> in the U.S./ Thunderhead <strong>Alliance</strong> <strong>2007</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!