18.01.2015 Views

2007 Benchmarking Report - Alliance for Biking & Walking

2007 Benchmarking Report - Alliance for Biking & Walking

2007 Benchmarking Report - Alliance for Biking & Walking

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bicycling & <strong>Walking</strong> in the U.S./ Thunderhead <strong>Alliance</strong> <strong>2007</strong><br />

20<br />

CURRENT STATUS OF BICYCLING<br />

percent<br />

Overview of<br />

Cycling and Cycling Safety Nationwide and nationwide in is 0.90%, with the average <strong>for</strong> metropolitan areas of<br />

Major U.S. Cities<br />

0.94%. Oregon is the top state <strong>for</strong> overall bicycle mode share<br />

with 2.36% of all trips by bike. Tennessee and West Virginia rank<br />

1.9%<br />

lowest in bike to work commute share with only 0.07% of work<br />

1.7%<br />

trips by bike. Arkansas ranks lowest <strong>for</strong> all bike trips according<br />

Nationwide<br />

to NHTS estimates, with only 0.15% of all trips by bike.<br />

Overview of Cycling and Cycling Safety<br />

Nationwide and in Most-Populous U.S. Cities<br />

2.0%<br />

1.5%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.5%<br />

0.0%<br />

0.40%<br />

0.68%<br />

% of trips to work by bike<br />

In Major U.S. Cities<br />

0.90%<br />

estimated % of all<br />

bike<br />

0.94%<br />

trips by<br />

% of traffic fatalties<br />

are cyclists<br />

Sources: ACS (2005), NHTS (2001-2002) , FARS (2003-2005), City Surveys<br />

Note: estimated % of all trips by bike is from NHTS and represents metropolitan<br />

areas as opposed to cities<br />

source available, the 2005 ACS. While the decennial Census is<br />

taken in April, ACS data is collected throughout the year. The<br />

time of year the Census data is collected might impact reported<br />

bike and walk share of work trips. This is particularly true in cities<br />

such as Minneapolis and Washington, D.C. which can still be<br />

cold in April. Although the decennial Census has a larger sample<br />

size, in this case, the ACS may more accurately reflect bicycle<br />

travel because it is collected throughout the year. Estimated cycling<br />

mode share from the NHTS was also included in the data<br />

tables (pages 24-27) <strong>for</strong> comparison.<br />

The Numbers: Findings on Bicycle Mode Share<br />

Thunderhead used 2005 ACS to determine that nationwide,<br />

an average of 0.40% of trips to work are by bike. In the major<br />

U.S. cities studied here, the bicycle commute share is higher<br />

at 0.68%. Montana has the highest bike to work share at 1.60%.<br />

According to NHTS estimates, the total bicycle mode share<br />

that<br />

Who Bikes<br />

Bicycle Demographics: Data Limitations<br />

Determining who rides bikes is also difficult: the fact<br />

that only work trips are counted leaves out trips taken <strong>for</strong> nonwork<br />

purposes, such as those made by children, <strong>for</strong> recreational<br />

purposes, or in combination with other modes of transportation.<br />

Part of the ef<strong>for</strong>ts to increase and standardize local trip counts<br />

is including demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation in these surveys. Local<br />

ef<strong>for</strong>ts have been conducted to capture in<strong>for</strong>mation on cycling<br />

demographics (including some referenced in the Introduction<br />

chapter of this report). However, because there is no standardized<br />

<strong>for</strong>mat used <strong>for</strong> these surveys, Thunderhead relied on ACS<br />

and NHTS data <strong>for</strong> demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Cyclists’ Income<br />

There is almost no variation at all in the bicycle mode<br />

share by income class. Data from the 2001 NHTS shows that<br />

cycling mode share is roughly 0.9% <strong>for</strong> all income classes. However,<br />

a more comprehensive examination of the socio-economics<br />

of cycling may reveal a difference in trip purpose among income<br />

classes (i.e. lower-income cyclists may cycle more <strong>for</strong> utility<br />

while high-income cyclists may cycle more <strong>for</strong> recreation).<br />

Regardless of the reason <strong>for</strong> cycle trips, these data show that<br />

cycling is a universal activity.<br />

Less than<br />

$20,000<br />

Cyclist Mode Share by Income Class<br />

$20,000 to<br />

$39,999<br />

Household Income<br />

$40,000 to<br />

$74,999<br />

$75,000 to<br />

$99,999<br />

$100,000<br />

and over<br />

0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.8% 0.9%<br />

Source: Pucher, John and John L. Renne, 2003. (cont. page 29)<br />

All

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!