Inside the Black Box - Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix B: Bibliography9 Abrazaldo, W., Adefuin, J-A., Henderson-Frakes, J., Lea, C., Leufgen, J., Lewis-Charp, H., Soukamneuth, S., & Wiegand, A. (2009). Evaluation of the YouthBuild youth offender grants. Oakland, CA: Social Policy Research Associates. Abt Associates. (2009). Innovative strategies for increasing self-sufficiency (ISIS) project: Stakeholder views from early outreach. Bethesda, MD: Author. Abt Associates, & Metis Associates. (2005). A jobs initiative research brief: Approaches to measuring and tracking career advancement. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Bearer-Friend, J. (2009, November). Measuring student achievement at postsecondary institutions. Washington, DC: National Governor’s Association Center for Best Practices. Bellotti, J., Rosenberg, L., Sattar, S., Esposito, A.M., & Ziegler, J. (2010). Reinvesting in America's youth: Lessons from the 2009 Recovery Act Summer Youth Employment Initiative. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Bloom, D. (2009). Transitional jobs reentry demonstration: Testing strategies to help former prisoners find and keep jobs and stay out of prison. Chicago, IL: The Joyce Foundation. Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., Rapp, C. A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A. F., Bell, M. D., & Blyler, C. R. (2001). Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice in psychiatric services. Psychiatric Services, 52(3), 313-322. Bone, J. (2010). TANF education and training: Kentucky’s Ready to Work program. Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy. 9 Not all sources listed are mentioned in the report, but all were reviewed as part of the background research Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 82
Bragg, D.D., Kim, E., & Barnett, E. A. (2006). Creating access and success: Academic pathways reaching underserved students. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2006, 135, 5-19. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187-249). London, England: Jessica Kingsley. Brown, D., Maxwell, S., DeJesus, E., & Schiraldi, V. (2002). Barriers and promising approaches to workforce and youth development for young offenders toolkit. Baltimore, MD: Annie E. Casey Foundation. Carnevale, A. P. (2010). Postsecondary education and training as we know it is not enough. Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Carnevale, A.P., & Rose, S.J. (2011). The undereducated American. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. (2010). Chicago workforce development programs: System map and inventory. Chicago, IL: Author. Chisman, F. (2009). Background and supporting evidence for adult education for work. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy. Clymer, C. (2003). By design: Engaging employers in workforce development organizations. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures. Cohen, J. R., & Single, L. E. (2001). An examination of the perceived impact of flexible arrangements on professional opportunities in public accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, 32, 317-328. Cooney, K. (2011). The business of job creation: An examination of the social enterprise approach to workforce development. Journal of Poverty, 15, 88-107. Council for Adult and Experiential Learning (CAEL). (2006). Building blocks for building skills: An inventory of adult learning models and innovations. Chicago, IL: Council for Adult and Experiential Learning (CAEL). Easterly, L. (2008). An educational model for workforce development: Dissemination of evidence-based practices. Community Mental Health Journal, 45(3), 199-208. doi: 10.1007/s10597-008-9170-7 Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago 83
Page 1 and 2:
Inside the Black Box: What Makes Wo
Page 3 and 4:
Acknowledgments We would like to th
Page 5 and 6:
Policy and Advocacy Efforts .......
Page 7 and 8:
Executive Summary The workforce dev
Page 9 and 10:
1. Interface with other required da
Page 11 and 12:
While acknowledging funding as a pr
Page 13 and 14:
Introduction The workforce developm
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 1: Interaction of Influences
Page 17 and 18:
Review of Recent Literature A revie
Page 19 and 20:
development system and found that i
Page 21 and 22:
for contributing to program success
Page 23 and 24:
capture all of the participants’
Page 25 and 26:
The organizations also reported tha
Page 27 and 28:
that needs to be collected. Another
Page 29 and 30:
Recommendation 2: Develop longitudi
Page 31 and 32:
seldom systematically collected by
Page 33 and 34:
With regard to the planning and dev
Page 35 and 36:
models in order to best serve their
Page 37 and 38: organizations are interested in col
Page 39 and 40: Poor attitude, poor work history, o
Page 41 and 42: Organizations often use a wide rang
Page 43 and 44: …a more holistic approach to work
Page 45 and 46: in the industry. Professional crede
Page 47 and 48: Success Factors: Workforce Provider
Page 49 and 50: education or no work experience. Ot
Page 51 and 52: equirements. As part of these effor
Page 53 and 54: given as the reason organizations d
Page 55 and 56: passion to see, to transform this c
Page 57 and 58: permanent job opportunities. These
Page 59 and 60: Meet the Needs of Participants Many
Page 61 and 62: participant is linked to an opening
Page 63 and 64: Provide Business Services to Engage
Page 65 and 66: The organizations in the study all
Page 67 and 68: community, such as the services the
Page 69 and 70: depend more heavily on other fundin
Page 71 and 72: Sometimes a legislation that is out
Page 73 and 74: on the participants they serve. Als
Page 75 and 76: Community engagement is also essent
Page 77 and 78: Website Description Length of Progr
Page 79 and 80: Eligibility Participants Served Par
Page 81 and 82: Participants Served ninth grade lev
Page 83 and 84: Length of Program Size of Program E
Page 85 and 86: Size of Program Eligibility Partici
Page 87: Eligibility Participants Served Ind
Page 91 and 92: Herr, T., & Wagner, S. L. (2007). B
Page 93 and 94: NGA Center for Best Practices, Nati
Page 95 and 96: The Workforce Boards of Metropolita
Page 97 and 98: The qualitative design of this proj
Page 99: 1313 East 60th Street Chicago, IL 6
show all

Inside the Black Box - Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?